Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bernard v. Hartford Insurance, 12 So. 3d 1098.

15 citing documents.

Shawn Copell v. Arceneaux Ford, Inc. and Amtrust North America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
3 Cir. 6/3/09), writ denied, 09- 1524 (La.
Karlin Riley Versus Rachel Lee Hollander, John D. Hollander, and Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
App. 3 Cir. 6/3/09), The exhibit is identified in the record as “Plaintiff 1D In Globo.” 19-CA-520 C/W 19-C-473 8 1100-01, writ denied, 09-1524 (La.10/9/09)
Louis Ridgel v. Mitchell Chevalier, St. Bernard Parish Fire Department Through the St. Bernard Parish Government, and Lexington … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Calvin Joseph Guidry, Jr., Et Ux. v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 6/3/09), writ denied, 09- 1524 (La.
Guidry v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc. 203 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 6/3/09) , , writ denied, 09-1524 (La.10/9/09), ; Stoll v. Allstate Ins.
Calvin Joseph Guidry, Jr., Et Ux. v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 6/3/09), writ denied, 09-1524 (La.
Guidry v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc. 191 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 6/3/09) , , writ denied, 09-1524 (La.10/9/09), ; Stoll v. Allstate Ins.
Tyron Reed v. Dondi Lacombe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 6/3/09), writ denied, 09-1524 (La.
Williams v. Mathieu 155 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 6/3/09), , as authority for their argument that a trial court may use a break in treatment as a factor when determining whether said treatment is related to the subject accident (citing Griffin v. Kurica, 03-190, p. 7 (La.App.
Olympia Minerals, LLC v. H. S. Resources, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 6/3/09), writ denied, 09-1524 (La.
Olympia Minerals, LLC v. HS Resources, Inc. 123 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 6/3/09), , writ denied, 09-1524 (La.10/9/09), (), the court stated: When findings are based on determinations regarding the credibility of witnesses, the manifest error-clearly wrong standard demands great deference to the trier of fact’s findings; for onl
Melissa Dore v. Mitsui Sumitomo Ins., USA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 6/3/09), -01, writ denied, 09-1524 (La.
Dore v. Mitsui Sumitomo Ins., USA 117 So. 3d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 6/3/09), -01 , writ denied, 09-1524 (La.10/9/09), (quoting Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-201, p. 6 (La.10/19/1999), ): It is well settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a finding of fact by a trial court or a jury in th
Shenan Smith Purvis v. Grant Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 6//3/09), -01, writ denied, 09-1524 (La.
Jerrl L. Thompson v. Haralampos Rizos La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 6//3/09), -01, writ denied, 09-1524 (La.