Mouton v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.
Mouton v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., 259 So. 3d 1083 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018).
Opinion text
Robert E. Landry, Patrick D. Gallaugher, Kevin P. Fontenot, Scofield, Gerard, Pohorelsky, Gallaugher & Landry, 901 Lakeshore Drive, Suite 900, Lake Charles, LA 70601, (337) 433-9436, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: Citgo Petroleum Corporation Craig Isenberg, Kyle W. Siegel, Joshua O. Cox, Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Sarver, LLC, 909 Poydras, 24 th Floor, New Orleans, LA 70112, (504) 589-9700, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT APPELLANT: Citgo Petroleum Corporation Wells T. Watson, Jake D. Buford, Baggett, McCall, Burgess, Watson & Gaughan, P.O. Drawer 7820, Lake Charles, LA 70606-7820, (337) 478-8888, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE: Leslie Mouton Richard Elliott Wilson, Somer G. Brown, Cox, Cox, Filo, Camel & Wilson, LLC, 723 Broad Street, Lake Charles, LA 70601, (337) 436-6611, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE: Leslie Mouton Court composed of Sylvia R. Cooks, John D. Saunders, and Elizabeth A. Pickett, Judges. COOKS, Judge. For the reasons assigned by this court in Bowling v. CITGO Petroleum Corp. , 18-169 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/28/18) , --- So.3d ----, the judgment of the trial court awarding Leslie Mouton $10,000.00 in damages for fear of developing disease is reversed. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND RENDERED. Pickett, J. concurs in part and dissents in part for the reasons assigned in 18-169, Bowling v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.