Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Achord v. City of Baton Rouge, 489 So. 2d 1373.

23 citing documents.

Smith v. CITY OF RUSTON 7 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
3d Cir.1993) (court found that the city complied with statutory pay differentials by basing differentials on the base salary of entry level firemen); 2 (La.App.
Wrm v. Hcv 923 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
W.R.M. v. H.C v. and M.J.V. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
“[S]tatutes of limitations are not accorded retroactive application where doing so would operate unconstitutionally to deprive a party of vested rights.” (La.App.
W.R.M. v. H.C.V. 923 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
“[Statutes of limitations are not accorded retroactive application where doing so would operate unconstitutionally to deprive a party of vested rights.” (La.App.
Baldwin v. Live Oak Manor Volunteer Fire Co. 888 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Elevating Boats, Inc. v. St. Bernard Parish 795 So. 2d 1153 La. 2001
Firefighters v. City of New Orleans 767 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Boneski v. City of Abbeville 745 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Bd. 638 So. 2d 645 La. 1994
[4] In addition to the court of appeal's decision being wrong as a matter of law, (La.App.
Price v. City of Baton Rouge 637 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Board 625 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co. v. Tarver 622 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Haskin v. City of Lafayette 613 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Two cases are brought to the attention of the court, (La.App.
Sanchez v. Abita Lumber Co. 578 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
App. 3d Cir.1986); (La.App.
Robinson v. City of Baton Rouge 566 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Rusher v. Winningham Nissan Volvo, Inc. 550 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Achord v. City of Baton Rouge 542 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Levy v. Civil Service Commission of New Orleans 538 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
In Subsections (A)(9) and (10) the statute merely states that the minimum salaries for persons in these positions are to be “not less than twenty-five percent above that of a fireman.” (La.App.
Kozlowski v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF HHR 534 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Brown v. Reese 532 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
App. 3d Cir.1986); (La.App.
D'Spain v. D'Spain 527 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Doyle v. St. Patrick Hosp. 499 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Achord v. City of Baton Rouge 493 So. 2d 641 La. 1986
Prior report: La.App., .