Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mouton v. State, 525 So. 2d 1136.

31 citing documents.

Henry L. Klein, the Succession of Frederick P. Heisler and Levy Gardens Partners 2007 Lp v. Lewis Title … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Berthelot v. Berthelot 254 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Simone B. Guillory v. Samuel S. Broussard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
The supreme court has held, “The unjust enrichment remedy is ‘only applicable to fill a gap in the law where no express remedy is provided.’ (La.App.
Guillory v. Broussard 242 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Alexander v. La. State Board of Private Investigator Examiners 211 So. 3d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 3 Cir. 4/3/02), ; South Central Bell, supra; (La.
Allen v. Allen 210 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State Department of Children & Family Services ex rel. J.C. v. Charles 131 So. 3d 1054 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Under Article 2298, the remedy of unjust enrichment is subsidiary in nature, and is “only applicable to fill a gap in the law where no express remedy is provided.” Walters v. MedSouth Record Management, LLC, 10-0353 (La.6/4/10), ( (La.App.
Vagelos v. Abramson 126 So. 3d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Dugas , 11-0178 at p. 14, 71 So.3d at 1068; (La.App.
Pinegrove Electrical Supply Co. v. Cat Key Construction, Inc. 88 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The unjust enrichment remedy is “only applicable to fill a gap in the law where no express remedy is provided.” (La.App.
Dugas v. Thompson 71 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
MJH Operations, Inc. v. Manning 63 So. 3d 296 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
The unjust enrichment remedy is “only applicable to fill a gap in the law where no express remedy is provided.” Walters, supra; (La.App.
Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 48 So. 3d 234 La. 2010
3 Cir. 11/28/07) , , writ denied, 08-298 (La.4/4/08), , (La.App.
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc. 45 So. 3d 991 La. 2010
Walters v. MedSouth Record Management, LLC 38 So. 3d 241 La. 2010
The unjust enrichment remedy is “only applicable to fill a gap in the law where no express remedy is provided.” (La.App.
Walters v. MedSouth Record Management, LLC 38 So. 3d 243 La. 2010
The unjust enrichment remedy is “only applicable to fill a gap in the law where no express remedy is provided.” (La.App.
Walters v. MEDSOUTH RECORD MANAGEMENT, LLC 38 So. 3d 245 La. 2010
The unjust enrichment remedy is “only applicable to fill a gap in the law where no express remedy is provided.” (La.App.
Gallant Investments, Ltd. v. Illinois Central Railroad 7 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
LEJEUNE BROS. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co. 981 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Lejeune Brothers, Inc. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co., LLC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Commercial Union v. CBC TEMPORARY STAFFING 897 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Corbello v. Iowa Production 850 So. 2d 686 La. 2003
Cutrer v. Illionois Central Gulf R. Co., supra at 1020, 1021 ( (La.
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Todd 834 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Builders Supply of Ruston, Inc. v. Qualls 750 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
art. 2298; Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick, 27,241 (La.App.2d Cir.08/23/95), , writ denied, 95-2579 (La.12/15/95), ; (La.App.
Sadler v. Midboe 723 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Morris & Dickson Co. v. Jones Brothers Co., Inc. 691 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Shahla v. City of Port Allen 601 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Firmin v. Denham Springs Floor Covering 595 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Cutrer v. Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co. 581 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
LOUISIANA NAT. BANK v. Belello 577 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Creely v. Leisure Living, Inc., -22 (La.1983); (La.App.
Harper v. Kennedy 561 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
See Creely v. Leisure Living, Inc., Edmonston v. A-Second Mortgage Company of Slidell, Inc., (La.App.
Mouton v. State 526 So. 2d 1112 La. 1988
Prior report: La.App., .