Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hurst v. Ricard, 558 So. 2d 1269.

18 citing documents.

Bradford Land Company, L.L.C. v. Montagnet Properties 2, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Hood Partners, L.L.C. v. David D. Davidge, Jr. and Sherry Anita Davidge Burke La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Carroll Edward Clark, Sr. and Ruby Janette Phillips Clark v. David Fazekas and Deborah Fazekas La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Stephanie Keenan v. Horace Keenan, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
The purpose of these articles is “to insure that the public in general, and title examiners, successful litigants, officials charged with executions of judgments and surveyors in particular, can accurately deal with the immovable property.” (La.App.
Keenan v. Keenan 186 So. 3d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The purpose of these articles is "to insure that the public in general, and title examiners, successful litigants, officials charged with executions of judgments and surveyors in particular, can accurately deal with the immovable property.” (La.App.
Goal Properties, Inc. v. Janet Craig Prestridge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
art. 2089.3 The purpose of these articles is “to insure that the public in general, and title examiners, successful litigants, officials charged with executions of judgments and surveyors in particular, can accurately deal with the immovable property.” (La.App.
Goal Properties, Inc. v. Prestridge 150 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 The purpose of these articles is “to insure that the public in general, and title examiners, successful litigants, officials charged with executions of judgments and surveyors in particular, can accurately deal with the immovable property.” (La.App.
Donald A. Cross, Et Ux. v. Timber Trails Apartments La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 1982) (amendment to fix the dates upon which the awarded benefits would begin and end was clarification and did not change substance of the original judgment); (La.App.
Cross v. Timber Trails Apartments 949 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
4 Cir.1982) (amendment to fix the dates upon which the awarded benefits would begin and end was clarification and did not change substance of the original judgment); (La.App.
Hebert v. Blue's Auto and Truck Parts 804 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Rebco Marine, Inc. v. Homestead Ins. Co. 706 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Martin v. David 685 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Deano v. Brouillette 664 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
United Companies Financial Corp. v. Austin 618 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Sellers v. Sinegal 607 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
appeal after remand, (La.App.
Creel v. Bogalusa Com. Medical Center 580 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Bonaventure v. Pourciau 577 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Hurst v. Ricard 559 So. 2d 1378 La. 1990
Prior report: La.App., .