Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Anderson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 642 So. 2d 208.
-
First Heritage Credit of Louisiana, LLC v. Ladarrien Griffin
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
1 Cir. 4/8/94), writ denied, 94-2400 (La.11/29/94)
- Gilley v. Gilley Enterprises, Inc. 222 So. 3d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
-
Gorman v. Miller
136 So. 3d 834
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
1 Cir. 4/8/94) , , writ denied, 94-2400 (La.11/29/94), .
- BARABAY PROP. HOLD. CORP. v. Boh Bros. Const. Co., LLC 991 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
-
Howard Hebert v. Bill-Wood Limited Liability Company, D/B/A Billeaud Planters, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
1 Cir. 4/8/94), (on rehearing), writ denied, 94-2400 (La.
-
Hebert v. Bill-Wood Ltd. Liability Co.
862 So. 2d 1227
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
1 Cir. 4/8/94) , (on rehearing), writ denied, 94-2400 (La.11/29/94), .” Arnette v. NPC Servs.
-
Thomas v. De St. James
846 So. 2d 765
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
1 Cir. 4/8/94) ; , writ denied, 94-2400 (La.11/29/94); , the second circuit discussed the purpose for the ten-day period between service and hearing of the motion for summary judgment: The requirement of La.C.C.P.
-
Jackson v. General Motors Truck Plant
830 So. 2d 426
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
1st Cir.4/8/94), , writ denied, 94-2400 (La.11/29/94), , discussed the purpose for the ten-day period between service and hearing of the motion for summary judgment: 1 sThe requirement of La.
- Prince v. K-Mart Corp. 815 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
-
Arnette v. NPC Services, Inc.
808 So. 2d 798
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
1 Cir. 4/8/94) , (on rehearing), writ denied, 94-2400 (La.11/29/94), .
-
O'NEAL v. Blackwell
818 So. 2d 118
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1 Cir. 4/8/94), (on rehearing), writ denied, 94-2400 (La.11/29/94), ; see also Murphy v. L & L Marine Transportation, Inc., 97-33, p. 6 (La.App.
-
Adams v. Arceneaux
809 So. 2d 190
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1 Cir. 4/8/94) , ; Continental Cas.
-
Dardar v. York
808 So. 2d 519
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1 Cir. 4/8/94), (on rehearing), writ denied, 94-2400 (11/29/94), ; see also Washington v. Savoie, 92-2957, pp. 4-6 (La.4/11/94), -1180 .
-
Stewart v. Carter
759 So. 2d 297
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
1st Cir.4/8/94), , writ denied, 94-2400 (La.11/29/94), , the court discussed *299 the purpose for the ten-day period between service and hearing of the motion for summary judgment: The requirement of La.
-
Frisard v. Autin
747 So. 2d 813
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1 Cir. 4/8/94) , (on rehearing), writ denied, 94-2400 (La.11/29/94), ; Dyes v. Isuzu Motors, Limited in Japan, (La.App.
-
Dardar v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.
739 So. 2d 330
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1st Cir.4/8/94); , writ denied, 94-2400 (La.11/29/94); , in that it also offers consumers the option to select UM coverage for bodily injury only and not UM property damage.
-
Sutherland v. Babin
735 So. 2d 881
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
App. 1 Cir. 4/8/94) ; (La.App.
-
Horne v. Horace Mann Insurance Co.
717 So. 2d 273
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
1st Cir.4/8/94), , writ denied 94-2400 (La.11/29/94), , and Holbrook v. Holliday, 93,1639 (La.App.
-
Vardaman v. Baker Center, Inc.
711 So. 2d 727
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
1st Cir. 4/8/94), , writ denied, 94-2400 (La.
-
Kanz v. Wilson
703 So. 2d 1331
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
1st Cir. 4/8/94); -214 (on rehearing), writ denied, 94-2400 (La.11/29/94); .
-
Longo v. Bercegeay
692 So. 2d 531
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
1 Cir. 4/8/94) ; , writ denied, 94-2400 (La.11/29/94); ; Young v. Shelter Ins.
-
Cangelosi v. Allstate Ins. Co.
680 So. 2d 1358
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
1st Cir. 4/8/94), , writ denied, 94-2400 (La.11/29/94), .
-
Pine v. Doolittle
677 So. 2d 686
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
1st Cir. 4/8/94), , writ denied, 94-2400 (La.
- Daigle v. Authement 676 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-
McCurtis v. Free
673 So. 2d 701
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
1st Cir.); (on rehearing), writ denied, 94-2400 (La.
-
Russo v. Reed
673 So. 2d 1231
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
1st Cir. 8/25/94), , writ denied, 94-2400 (La.
-
Dardar v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
672 So. 2d 298
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
The Trial Court erred in failing to follow this Honorable Court’s (La.App.
-
Fontenot v. Henderson
670 So. 2d 489
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
1 Cir. 4/8/94) ; , writ denied, 94-2400 (La.
- Herman v. Rome 668 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
-
Banks v. Patterson Ins. Co.
664 So. 2d 127
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
1st Cir. 4/08/94), , writ denied, 94-2400 (La.