Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dennison v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 645 So. 2d 1227.

13 citing documents.

Hill International, Inc. v. JTS Realty Corporation, Perkins Rowe Associates, L.L.C. and Perkins Rowe Associates II, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Michael D. Vanek and Vanek Real Estate, LLC v. Charles Robertson and Div-Conn of Lake Charles, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
1 Cir. 11/10/94), wherein the first circuit reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of a third party defendant against the plaintiff who had not named the third party defendant as a direct defendant.
Vanek v. Robertson 261 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1 Cir. 11/10/94) , , wherein the first circuit reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of a third party defendant against the plaintiff who had not named the third party defendant as a direct defendant.
Roderick J. Rowan, Et Ux. v. Burke Homes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
1 Cir. 11/10/94), Wells & Parker Architects, Inc. v. Monroe-McKeen Plaza Housing Dev.
Rowan v. Burke Homes, Inc. 157 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
1 Cir. 11/10/94) , ; Wells & Parker Architects, Inc. v. Monroe-McKeen Plaza Housing Dev.
Christopher Sims v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 11/10/94), the first circuit found that coverage in a Liberty Mutual policy did not extend to the driver of a rented vehicle who was not listed as an additional driver under the terms of the rental agreement.
Sims v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 897 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 11/10/94) , , the first circuit found that coverage in a Liberty Mutual policy did not extend to the driver of a rented vehicle who was not listed as an additional driver under the terms of the rental agreement.
Collins v. Randall 836 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
1st Cir.11/10/94), , we faced a similar issue to that presented in Hearty .
Straughter v. Harnwell 715 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
App. 1st Cir. 11/10/94), ; Breaux v. Claudel, 93-1580 (La.App.3d Cir. 06/01/94), .
Paige v. Tucker 702 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Succession of Carrier v. Allstate Insurance 702 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
1 Cir. 11/10/94) ; , in support of its contention that the exclusion was not against public policy.
Sanders v. Zeagler 670 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Pitts v. Pickens 655 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by