Swla Hospital Association D/B/A Lake Charles Memorial Hospital v. Superior Carriers, Inc.
Swla Hospital Association D/B/A Lake Charles Memorial Hospital v. Superior Carriers, Inc., No. CA-0006-0807 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Nov. 2, 2006).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
06-807
SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
D/B/A LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
VERSUS
SUPERIOR CARRIERS, INC.
**********
APPEAL FROM THE
FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO. 2006-1020
HONORABLE WILFORD D. CARTER, DISTRICT JUDGE
**********
OSWALD A. DECUIR
JUDGE
**********
Court composed of Oswald A. Decuir, Jimmie C. Peters, and Glenn B. Gremillion,
Judges.
REVERSED.
John Stanton Bradford
Stockwell, Sievert, Viccellio, Clements
& Shaddock, L.L.P.
P. O. Box 2900
Lake Charles, LA 70602
(337) 436-9491
Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee:
Southwest Louisiana Hospital Association
Perry R. Staub, Jr.
Mark Van Horn
Larry E. Demmons
Taggart, Morton, Ogden, Staub,
Rougelot & O’Brien, L.L.C
2100 Energy Centre
1100 Poydras Street
New Orleans, LA 70163-2100
(504) 599-8500
Counsel for Intervenor/Appellee:
CCN, Inc.
Thomas A. Filo
Cox, Cox, Filo, Camel & Wilson
723 Broad Street
Lake Charles, LA 70601
(337) 436-6611
Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee:
Southwest Louisiana Hospital Association
H. Clay Ward, III
Attorney at Law
1111 Ryan Street
Lake Charles, LA 70601
(337) 433-9320
Counsel for Defendant/Appellant:
Superior Carriers, Inc.
DECUIR, Judge.
This is a claim filed in district court by a provider to recover payment for
medical services rendered to a workers’ compensation claimant. The defendant
appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of the provider finding that PPO
network discounts are invalid under workers’ compensation law.
FACTS
On December 8, 2003, Southwest Louisiana Hospital Association, d/b/a Lake
Charles Memorial Hospital (LCMH), rendered medical services to Steven G. Hollie,
an employee of defendant, Superior Carriers, Inc. LCMH billed $4,605.00 for these
services. Instead of reimbursing LCMH the workers’ compensation schedule rate of
$4,144.50, Superior’s workers’ compensation carrier, Great West Casualty Company,
paid the PPO network discount amount of $3,914.29.
LCMH filed this petition for declaratory relief asking the court to declare this
discount invalid and unenforceable for failing to comply with the Louisiana Preferred
Provider Organization Act (La.R.S. 40:2203.1) and for discounting this workers’
compensation bill below the lesser of LCMH’s actual charge or the fee schedule
amount in violation of La.R.S. 23:1033. The trial court granted the relief sought in
both instances. Superior lodged this appeal. CCN, Inc., the administrator of the PPO
network, filed a motion to intervene, which this court referred to the merits.
DISCUSSION
Superior first argues that this case should be reversed based on the en banc
opinion of this court in Beutler-England Chiropractic Clinic v. Mermentau Rice, Inc.
05-942 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/31/06), 931 So2d 553. We agree. In Beutler-England, the
court held that La.R.S. 23:1310.3(E), as amended, applies retroactively and grants
original and exclusive jurisdiction over contractual and coverage disputes like the
ones in the case at bar to workers’ compensation judges. LCMH argues that, even if
that is the case, the district court had jurisdiction over the claim for violation of
La.R.S. 40:2203.1 and that part of the judgment should stand. We are unpersuaded
by this argument. Aside from the court’s interest in avoiding piecemeal litigation, the
resolution of that dispute affects the payment of benefits under the workers’
compensation act and, therefore, the Office of Workers’ Compensation had exclusive
jurisdiction. Accordingly, the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction in this
case.
We need not discuss the remaining issues raised by the parties because this
finding is dispositive. Likewise, the motion to intervene filed by CCN, Inc. is denied.
DECREE
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is reversed for
want of subject matter jurisdiction. All costs of this appeal are taxed to appellant,
Superior Carriers, Inc.
REVERSED.
2