State of Louisiana v. One (1) 1953, 4 Door Green Chevrolet Vin Laa843774
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., December 28, 2007
State of Louisiana v. One (1) 1953, 4 Door Green Chevrolet Vin Laa843774, No. CA-0007-0998 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Oct. 31, 2007).
Opinion text
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
07-998
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VERSUS
ONE (1) 1953, 4 DOOR GREEN CHEVROLET, VIN # LAA843774, ET AL.
**********
APPEAL FROM THE
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF SABINE, NO. 58,871
HONORABLE CHARLES BLAYLOCK ADAMS, DISTRICT JUDGE
**********
BILLY HOWARD EZELL
JUDGE
**********
Court composed of Oswald A. Decuir, Marc T. Amy, and Billy H. Ezell, Judges.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Elvin Clemence Fontenot, Jr.
Attorney at Law
110 East Texas Street
Leesville, LA 71446
(337) 239-2684
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT:
Earnest McCray, Jr.
Anna Louise Garcie
Attorney at Law
Post Office Box 575
Many, LA 71449
(318) 729-9104
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE:
State of Louisiana
Earnest McCray, Jr.
FCC (Med), #13210-035
Post Office Box 26040
Beaumont, TX 77720
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT:
Earnest McCray, Jr.
EZELL, Judge.
On August 15, 2007, this court issued a rule for the Appellant to show cause by
brief only why the appeal in the instant case should not be dismissed as untimely. For
the reasons below, we dismiss the appeal.
On April 10, 2006, Appellee, the State of Louisiana, through the Sabine Parish
District Attorney, filed an application for warrant of seizure for forfeiture on the basis
of the owner of the property at issue having engaged in conduct giving rise to
forfeiture, as specified in La.R.S. 40:2601, et seq. On March 26, 2007, the trial court
rendered judgment forfeiting the property at issue. Notice of judgment was sent on
March 28, 2007. No motion for new trial was filed. On June 27, 2007, Appellant
filed a motion for appeal.
An appeal that does not suspend the effect or execution of an appealable order or
judgment may be taken within sixty days of the expiration of the delay for applying
for a new trial. La.Code Civ.P. art. 2087(A)(1). The delay for applying for a new
trial is seven days, exclusive of legal holidays, from the mailing of notice of
judgment. La.Code Civ.P. art. 1974.
In the instant case, the notice of judgment was mailed on March 28, 2007. The
delay for applying for a new trial expired on April 9, 2007. No motion for new trial
was filed. Thus, the delay for filing a devolutive appeal expired on June 8, 2007. As
the instant appeal was not filed until June 27, 2007, it was not timely filed.
Therefore, this court does not have jurisdiction. The appeal is dismissed.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
This opinion is NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION.
Rules 2-16.2 and 2-16.3, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal.
1