CA-0008-0246 Nonprecedential Dismissed Processed

Sports Design & Development, Inc. v. Amsouth Bank

Louisiana Court of Appeal, Third Circuit · Filed April 9, 2008

Opinion text

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

08-246

SPORTS DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, INC.

VERSUS

AMSOUTH BANK, ET AL.

**********
APPEAL FROM THE
NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, NO. 209,533
HONORABLE GEORGE CLARENCE METOYER, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE

**********
JIMMIE C. PETERS
JUDGE

**********

Court composed of John D. Saunders, Jimmie C. Peters, and Michael G. Sullivan,
Judges.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Christopher J. Roy, Jr.
Jacques M. Roy
Post Office Box 1592
Alexandria, LA 71309
(318) 487-9537
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT:
Robert G. Weeks, Jr.

Michael David Ferachi
McGlinchey, Stafford, PLLC
Fourteenth Floor, One American Place
Baton Rouge, LA 70825
(225) 383-9000
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLEES:
AmSouth Bank and Bill Myland

Marcia Olson
3006 Georges Lane
Alexandria, LA 71309
AGENT FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE:
Sports Design & Development, Inc.

PETERS, Judge.

On March 6, 2008, this court issued a rule for the appellant, Robert G. Weeks,

Jr., to show cause why the appeal in the instant case should not be dismissed as

having been taken prematurely. For the reasons below, we dismiss the appeal.

A judgment of dismissal for abandonment was entered in the trial court on

November 14, 2007. Notice of the signing of judgment was sent on November 19,

2007. Appellant filed a motion to set aside the judgment of dismissal on December

4, 2007. In addition, appellant filed a motion for devolutive appeal on January 4,

2008. However, by appellant’s admission and as evidenced in the record, no

judgment has been entered on the motion to set aside the judgment of dismissal.

Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 561 provides, in pertinent part, the

following:

(4) A motion to set aside a dismissal may be made only within thirty
days of the date of the sheriff’s service of the order of dismissal.
...
(5) An appeal of an order of dismissal may be taken only within sixty
days of the date of the sheriff’s service of the order of dismissal.
An appeal of an order of denial may be taken only within sixty
days of the date of the clerk’s mailing of the order of denial.

Here, appellant timely filed a motion to set aside the judgment of dismissal.

However, by appellant’s own recognition and as evidenced in the record, no judgment

has been rendered on the motion to set aside the judgment of dismissal. Therefore,

because the instant appeal has been taken prematurely, this court lacks appellate

jurisdiction of this matter. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. However, this

ruling does not preclude appellant from seeking appellate review at a time when this

matter becomes ripe for appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

This opinion is NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION.
Rules 2-16.2 and 2-16.3, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal.

1