John Carr Garrison, Jr. v. Toni Marie Trost D/B/A Lakeview Properties
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., June 2, 2010
John Carr Garrison, Jr. v. Toni Marie Trost D/B/A Lakeview Properties, No. CA-0010-0016 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Feb. 10, 2010).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Young v. Mobley 923 So. 2d 917
Opinion text
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
10-16
JOHN CARR GARRISON, JR., ET AL.
VERSUS
TONI MARIE TROST d/b/a LAKE VIEW PROPERTIES
************
APPEAL FROM THE
FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO. 2007-2629-B
HONORABLE R. RICHARD BRYANT, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE
************
JOHN D. SAUNDERS
JUDGE
************
Court composed of John D. Saunders, Marc T. Amy, and James T. Genovese,
Judges.
MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL DENIED.
Charles Schrumpf
Schrumpf & Schrumpf
3801 Maplewood Drive
Sulphur, LA 70663
(337) 625-9077
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE:
Toni Marie Trost
Skipper M. Drost
One Lakeshore Drive, Suite 100
Lake Charles, LA 70629
(337) 436-4546
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS:
John Carr Garrison, Jr.
Ramona Wilhite Garrison
SAUNDERS, Judge.
The defendant-appellee, Toni Marie Trost d/b/a Lakeview Properties, moves
to dismiss the appeal of the plaintiffs-appellants, John Carr Garrison, Jr. and Ramona
Wilhite Garrison, based on the failure of plaintiffs-appellants to timely perfect their
appeal. For the reason set forth below, we deny the motion.
Appellee argues that this devolutive appeal should be dismissed for the
Plaintiffs’ failure to timely pay appeal costs even though the costs were paid prior to
the lodging of the appeal. A motion to dismiss an appeal for failure to timely pay the
appeal costs must be filed no later than three days from the lodging of the record in
the appellate court or the return date, whichever is later. La.Code Civ.P. art. 2161;
Young v. Mobley, 05-547 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/1/06), 923 So.2d 917. The appeal was
lodged on January 6, 2010; however, appellee did not file the motion to dismiss until
January 19, 2010. Thus, appellee’s motion to dismiss on this ground was not timely
filed.
Accordingly, for this reason, we deny the motion to dismiss the appeal.
MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL DENIED.
This opinion is NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION.
Rules 2-16.2 and 2-16.3, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal.
1