Deanne Henke v. Lisa S. Courville
Deanne Henke v. Lisa S. Courville, No. CA-0010-0277 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Apr. 28, 2010).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Marks v. 84 Lumber Co. 925 So. 2d 1267
- Strother v. Continental Cas. Co. 923 So. 2d 783
Opinion text
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
CA 10-277
DEANNE HENKE
VERSUS
ANTHONY J. FONTANA, JR.
************
APPEAL FROM THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. C200116092
HONORABLE GLENNON P. EVERETT, DISTRICT JUDGE
************
JIMMIE C. PETERS
JUDGE
************
Court composed of Jimmie C. Peters, Elizabeth A. Pickett, and James T. Genovese,
Judges.
SUSPENSIVE APPEAL DISMISSED.
APPEAL MAINTAINED AS DEVOLUTIVE.
Jeffery Paul Robert
Attorney at Law
8545 United Plaza Blvd., #350
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
(225) 924-9585
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES:
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Velocity Express Southwest, Inc.
Thomas Reginald Hightower, Jr.
Patrick Wade Kee
Michael Scott Harper
Attorneys at Law
Post Office Drawer 51288
Lafayette, LA 70505
(337) 233-0555
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES:
Lisa S. Courville
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Patrick Michael Amedee
Attorney at Law
Post Office Box 1092
Thibodeaux, LA 70302-1092
(985) 446-4811
COUNSEL FOR INTERVENOR-APPELLEE:
Delise, Amedee & Hall
Bobby Joseph Delise
Delise & Hall
7924 Maple Street
New Orleans, LA 70118
(504) 836-8000
COUNSEL FOR INTERVENOR-APPELLEE:
Delise, Amedee & Hall
Alton Jerold Hall, Jr.
Delise & Hall
516 W. 21st Ave.
Covington, LA 70433
(985) 249-5915
COUNSEL FOR INTERVENOR-APPELLEE:
Delise, Amedee & Hall
Anthony Jerome Fontana, Jr.
Attorney at Law
210 North Washington Street
Abbeville, LA 70510
(337) 898-8332
COUNSEL FOR INTERVENOR-APPELLEE:
Anthony Jerome Fontana, Jr.
Deanne Henke
107 Pericles Street
Lafayette, LA 70506
IN PROPER PERSON-APPELLANT:
Deanne Henke
PETERS, J.
The defendant-appellee, Anthony J. Fontana, Jr., moves to convert the
suspensive appeal of the plaintiff-appellant, Deanne Henke, to a devolutive appeal
based on the failure of the plaintiff to post a timely suspensive appeal bond. For the
reasons assigned, we grant the motion, dismiss the suspensive appeal, and maintain
the appeal as devolutive.
On November 23, 2009, the trial court entered a final written judgment on
attorneys’ fees. Notice of the signing of judgment was sent on November 25, 2009.
The plaintiff filed a notice of suspensive appeal on December 30, 2009, and the trial
court signed an order granting the appeal on the same date. The plaintiff’s bond was
set in the amount of $1,000.00. The appeal was lodged with this court on March 4,
2010. The defendant filed a motion to declare the appeal devolutive on March 24,
2010.1
In order to perfect a suspensive appeal, an appellant must obtain an order
granting the appeal and file the suspensive appeal bond within the delays set forth in
La.Code Civ.P. art. 2123. This article states, in pertinent part:
A. Except as otherwise provided by law, an appeal that
suspends the effect or the execution of an appealable order or judgment
may be taken, and the security therefor furnished, only within thirty days
of any of the following:
(1) The expiration of the delay for applying for a new trial or
judgment notwithstanding the verdict, as provided by Article 1974 and
Article 1811, if no application has been filed timely.
(2) The date of the mailing of notice of the court’s refusal to
grant a timely application for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding
the verdict, as provided under Article 1914.
1
We note that this court has considered a motion to dismiss suspensive appeal even though
it was filed more than three days from the date of lodging of the appeal. See Marks v. 84 Lumber Co.,
06-358 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/5/06), 925 So.2d 1267.
1
Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2123 clearly sets forth that the
suspensive appeal bond must be filed within the applicable thirty-day time period.
Here, suspensive appeal delays ran in January 2010. The appeal record indicates
that the plaintiff has not filed her suspensive appeal bond. Although a suspensive
appeal may be dismissed for failure to timely file the bond, the appeal should be
maintained as devolutive. Strother v. Continental Cas. Co., 05-1094 (La.App. 3 Cir.
2/8/06), 923 So.2d 783. Accordingly, we dismiss the suspensive appeal and maintain
the appeal as devolutive.
SUSPENSIVE APPEAL DISMISSED.
APPEAL MAINTAINED AS DEVOLUTIVE.
This opinion is NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION.
Rules 2-16.2 and 2-16.3, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal.
2