Patrick Richard v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation

STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

CA 18-371 consolidated with CA 18-370, CA 18-372

PATRICK RICHARD, ET AL.

VERSUS

CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, ET AL.

**********

APPEAL FROM THE
FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO. 2007-3392 c/w 2007-2879 and 2007-3052
HONORABLE RONALD F. WARE, DISTRICT JUDGE

**********

CANDYCE G. PERRET
JUDGE

**********

Court composed of John D. Saunders, Billy Howard Ezell, and Candyce G. Perret,
Judges.

AFFIRMED.

Robert E. Landry
Kevin P. Fontenot
Scofield, Gerard, Pohorelsky, Gallaugher & Landry
901 Lakeshore Drive, #900
Lake Charles, LA 70601
(337) 433-9436
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation

Craig Isenberg
Kyle W. Siegel
Joshua O. Cox
Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Sarver, LLC
909 Poydras, Ste 2400
New Orleans, LA 70112
(504) 589-9700
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation

Marshall Joseph Simien, Jr.
Simien Law Firm
One Lakeshore Drive, Suite 1110
Lake Charles, LA 70629
(337) 497-0022
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation

Wells Talbot Watson
Jake D. Buford
Bagget, McCall , Burgess, Watson & Gaughan
3006 Country Club Road
Lake Charles, LA 70605
(337) 478-8888
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE:
Rickey Haley
Gardenia Amos
Sara Stevens
Bill Peltier
Linda Harris

Richard Elliott Wilson
Somer G. Brown
Cox, Cox, Filo, Camel & Wilson, LLC
723 Broad Street
Lake Charles, LA 70601
(337) 436-6611
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE:
Sara Stevens
Gardenia Amos

Linda Harris
Rickey Haley

Kirk Albert Patrick, III
Heath Savant
Donahue, Patrick & Scott
450 Laurel St., Suite 1600
Baton Rouge, LA 70801
(225) 214-1908
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT:
R & R Construction, Inc.

PERRET, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in the companion and consolidated case hereto,

Arceneaux v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., 18-370 (La.App. 3 Cir. __/__/__), __ So.3d

__, the judgment of the trial court in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees and against

Appellant, CITGO Petroleum Corporation, is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are

assessed against Appellant, CITGO Petroleum Corporation.

AFFIRMED.