In Re: Marshall Legacy Foundation
In Re: Marshall Legacy Foundation, No. CA-0024-0245 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Nov. 13, 2024).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Cormier v. Roberson 691 So. 2d 807
- 389 So. 3d 1005 not in our corpus
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
24-245
IN RE: MARSHALL LEGACY FOUNDATION
**********
APPEAL FROM THE
FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO. 2015-3683
HONORABLE KENDRICK J. GUIDRY, DISTRICT JUDGE
**********
CHARLES G. FITZGERALD
JUDGE
**********
Court composed of Shannon J. Gremillion, Van H. Kyzar, and Charles G. Fitzgerald,
Judges.
AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.
James M. Garner
Joshua S. Force
Ashley G. Coker
Sher Garner Cahill Richter Klein & Hilbert, LLC
909 Poydras Street, 27th Floor
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
(504) 299-2100
Counsel for Appellant:
Preston L. Marshall
Ezra Pettis, Jr.
Pettis Law Firm, LLC
626 Broad Street
Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601
(337) 439-3939
Counsel for Appellant:
Preston L. Marshall
John P. Lahad
Susman Godfrey, L.L.P.
1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 653-7859
Counsel for Appellant:
Preston L. Marshall
Daniel A. Kramer
Lundy Law, L.L.P.
501 Broad Street
Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601
(337) 439-0707
Counsel for Appellant:
Preston L. Marshall
Jeffery W. Chambers
Chambers Law Group
711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2150
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 438-5244
Counsel for Appellant:
Preston L. Marshall
Michael Reese Davis
Tim P. Hartdegen
Hymel Davis & Petersen, LLC
10602 Coursey Blvd.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816
(225) 298-8118
Counsel forAppellee:
Elaine T. Marshall,
Co-Trustee of the Marshall Legacy Foundation
Joel G. Davis
P.O. Box 625
Oakdale, Louisiana 71463
(318) 335-8750
Counsel for Appellee:
Elaine T. Marshall,
Co-Trustee of the Marshall Legacy Foundation
Walter M. Sanchez
Sanchez Burke, LLC
1200 Ryan Street
Lake Charles, LA 70601
(337) 433-4405
Counsel for Appellee:
Elaine T. Marshall,
Co-Trustee of the Marshall Legacy Foundation
Todd S. Clemons
Janet D. Madison
Todd Clemons & Associates, APLC
1740 Ryan Street
Lake Charles, LA 70601
(337) 477-0000
Counsel for Appellee:
Dr. Stephen D. Cook,
Co-Trustee of the Marshall Legacy Foundation
Philip K. Jones, Jr.
Kelly T. Scalise
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
701 Poydras Street, Suite 5000
New Orleans, LA 70139
(504) 581-7979
Counsel for Appellee:
Dr. Stephen D. Cook,
Co -Trustee of the Marshall Legacy Foundation
FITZGERALD, Judge.
The appellant, Preston L. Marshall, seeks review of the trial court’s judgment
awarding court costs. The appellees are the co-trustees of the Marshall Legacy
Foundation, Elaine T. Marshall and Dr. Stephen D. Cook. 1
In October 2023, Elaine and Stephen, as trustees of the Marshall Legacy
Foundation, filed a motion to tax costs against Preston following a trial on the merits.
On January 24, 2024, the trial court signed a judgment awarding $116,393.57 in
costs to Elaine and Stephen. Preston now appeals this judgment.
On appeal, Preston asserts that the trial court erred in awarding costs to Elaine
and Stephen, individually, rather than in their representative capacities. We agree.
A rule to tax court costs under La.Code Civ.P. art. 1920 is incidental to the
original proceeding in which costs were incurred. “Article 1920 is directed to the
apportionment of costs between the parties.” Cormier v. Roberson, 96–1107, p. 4
(La.App. 1 Cir. 3/27/97), 691 So.2d 807, 809. “[A]n award of court costs is a money
judgment in favor of one or more parties who incurred court costs in participating in
the litigation.” Id. at 810.
Elaine and Stephen were not individually named in the original proceeding;
they appeared only in their representative capacities. Likewise, they filed their rule
to tax costs in their representative capacities.
Very simply, the trial court mistakenly awarded court costs to Elaine and
Stephen, individually, rather than in their representative capacities. 2
1
This memorandum opinion is issued in compliance with Uniform Rules—Courts of
Appeal, Rule 2–16.1(B).
2
Preston also assigned as error the following: “The Trial Court erred in awarding costs if
the Final Judgment in this matter is reversed.” In other words, Preston argues that the award of
costs should be reversed if the judgment in the original proceeding is reversed on appeal. However,
the judgment in the original proceeding was recently affirmed on appeal. See In re Marshall
Legacy Foundation, 23-522 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/12/24), 389 So.3d 1005. This assignment is thus
moot.
DISPOSITION
The trial court’s judgment of January 24, 2024, is amended to reflect that the
costs are awarded to Elaine T. Marshall and Dr. Stephen D. Cook, as trustees of the
Marshall Legacy Foundation. The judgment is affirmed in all other respects.
The costs of this appeal are assessed to Elaine T. Marshall and Dr. Stephen D.
Cook, as trustees of the Marshall Legacy Foundation.
AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.
2