Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Braning v. Braning, 449 So. 2d 670.
-
Westcott v. Westcott
11 So. 3d 45
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“By its very nature, a consent or compromise judgment is a bilateral contract wherein the parties adjust their differences by mutual consent, thereby putting an end to litigation (or anticipated litigation) with each party balancing the hope of gain against the fear of loss.” (La.App.
- Nelson v. Nelson 985 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
-
McAlpine v. McAlpine
679 So. 2d 85
La. 1996
App. 5th Cir.1984), writ denied, (post-separation waiver of permanent alimony valid); (La.App.
- Blitch Architects, Inc. v. "The Avenue Partnership" 632 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
- Kessel v. Kessel 624 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Broussard v. Broussard 617 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
- Black Collegiate Services, Inc. v. Ajubita 600 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
-
Homer Nat. Bank v. Nix
566 So. 2d 1071
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
CC Art. 3071; McLain v. McLain, supra; (La.App.
- Johnson v. Barkemeyer 560 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
Coffey v. Coffey
554 So. 2d 202
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
5th Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
- Succession of Simmons 527 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- Romero v. Romero 509 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
-
Gottsegen v. Gottsegen
503 So. 2d 588
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
4th Cir.1984); Braning v. Braning (La.
-
Garcia v. Garcia
491 So. 2d 1350
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
The consent decree of September 5, 1980, states that such ‘payments are not to be construed as alimony.’ ‘By its very nature a consent or compromise judgment is a bilateral contract wherein the parties adjust their differences by mutual consent, thereby putting an end to litigation, or anticipated litigation ...’ (LA.APP.
- Succession of Koch 487 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
-
McLain v. McLain
486 So. 2d 1044
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
App. 4th Cir.1984); Braning v. Braning, *1047 (La.App.
- Spencer v. Spencer 472 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985