Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sherman of Behalf of Magee v. B & G Crane Service, 455 So. 2d 1275.

17 citing documents.

  • Christopher J. Bruno v. Jennifer M. Medley, Individually and "Jennifer M. Medley Campaign Fund" La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
    App. 4 Cir. 12/12/01), Sherman for and on Behalf of Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.
  • Miralda v. Gonzalez 160 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Cir. 12/12/01), ; Sherman for and on Behalf of Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • Haney v. Davis 925 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 12/12/01), ; Sherman for and on Behalf of Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • Hardy v. EASY TV & APPLIANCES OF LOUISIANA, INC. 804 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Sherman for and on Behalf of Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • Lee v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 798 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir.), writ denied, (citing Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • Daisey v. Time Warner 761 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, citing Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • Winston v. Flamingo Casino 746 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    citing Sherman for and on Behalf of Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • Price v. City of New Orleans 672 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    citing Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • Tran v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. 665 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    4 Cir.1988); Sherman, for Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • New Hotel Monteleone, Inc. v. Depp's Bull Corner, Inc. 598 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    “Before damages for a frivolous appeal lie, it must be manifest that the appeal was taken solely for delay or that appealing counsel does not sincerely believe in the view of law he advocates.” Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • Viviano v. Arceneaux 572 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    “Before damages for a frivolous appeal lie, it must be manifest that the appeal was taken solely for delay or that appealing counsel does not sincerely believe in the view of law he advocates.” Sherman v. B & G Crane Services, (La.App.
  • Landy on Behalf of Landy v. Smith 542 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    See, Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • Martin v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 534 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Sherman, for Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • Ponthier v. Insurance Co. of North America 522 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    A similar argument was urged in Sherman, For Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • Hellpenstell v. Bonnabel Hosp. 523 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • Ashley Hall Interiors, Ltd. v. Pisano 520 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    FRIVOLOUS APPEAL “Before damages for a frivolous appeal lie, it must be manifest that the appeal was taken solely for delay or that appealing counsel does not sincerely believe in the view of law he advocates.” Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
  • Nunez v. St. Bernard Parish Fire Dept. 519 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.