Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sherman of Behalf of Magee v. B & G Crane Service, 455 So. 2d 1275.
-
Christopher J. Bruno v. Jennifer M. Medley, Individually and "Jennifer M. Medley Campaign Fund"
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 12/12/01), Sherman for and on Behalf of Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.
-
Miralda v. Gonzalez
160 So. 3d 998
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Cir. 12/12/01), ; Sherman for and on Behalf of Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
Haney v. Davis
925 So. 2d 591
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 12/12/01), ; Sherman for and on Behalf of Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
Hardy v. EASY TV & APPLIANCES OF LOUISIANA, INC.
804 So. 2d 777
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Sherman for and on Behalf of Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
Lee v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation
798 So. 2d 1225
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
4 Cir.), writ denied, (citing Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
Daisey v. Time Warner
761 So. 2d 564
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, citing Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
Winston v. Flamingo Casino
746 So. 2d 622
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
citing Sherman for and on Behalf of Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
Price v. City of New Orleans
672 So. 2d 1045
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
citing Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
Tran v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
665 So. 2d 507
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
4 Cir.1988); Sherman, for Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
New Hotel Monteleone, Inc. v. Depp's Bull Corner, Inc.
598 So. 2d 721
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
“Before damages for a frivolous appeal lie, it must be manifest that the appeal was taken solely for delay or that appealing counsel does not sincerely believe in the view of law he advocates.” Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
Viviano v. Arceneaux
572 So. 2d 813
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
“Before damages for a frivolous appeal lie, it must be manifest that the appeal was taken solely for delay or that appealing counsel does not sincerely believe in the view of law he advocates.” Sherman v. B & G Crane Services, (La.App.
-
Landy on Behalf of Landy v. Smith
542 So. 2d 731
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
See, Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
Martin v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
534 So. 2d 4
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Sherman, for Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
Ponthier v. Insurance Co. of North America
522 So. 2d 188
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
A similar argument was urged in Sherman, For Magee v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
Hellpenstell v. Bonnabel Hosp.
523 So. 2d 887
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
Ashley Hall Interiors, Ltd. v. Pisano
520 So. 2d 469
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
FRIVOLOUS APPEAL “Before damages for a frivolous appeal lie, it must be manifest that the appeal was taken solely for delay or that appealing counsel does not sincerely believe in the view of law he advocates.” Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.
-
Nunez v. St. Bernard Parish Fire Dept.
519 So. 2d 857
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Sherman v. B & G Crane Service, (La.App.