Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gormley v. Grand Lodge of State of La., 503 So. 2d 181.

29 citing documents.

Laura Carter v. Iberia Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
In Frederick, 626 So.2d at 472, this court wrote: Essentially the same concerns articulated for giving latitude to trial judges in their factual findings justify leaving largely to their discretion the admissions of cumulative evidence, (La.App.
Carter v. Iberia Parish Sch. Bd. 258 So. 3d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
In Frederick , 626 So.2d at 472 , this court wrote: Essentially the same concerns articulated for giving latitude to trial judges in their factual findings justify leaving largely to their discretion the admissions of cumulative evidence, Gormley v. Grand Lodge of State of Louisiana , (La.App.
Willie Buard v. Colfax Treating Company, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Simmons v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center 71 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Williams, supra; (La.App.
Brooks v. Wiley 985 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
West v. National RR Passenger Corp. 879 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Williams v. Super Trucks, Inc. 842 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Norris v. State, DOTD 813 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Lawson v. Straus 750 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Karagiannopoulos v. State Farm Fire & Cas. 752 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
2nd Cir. 6/26/96), , , writ denied, 96-1960 (La.11/1/96), ; (La.App.
Lavergne v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. 706 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Brown v. Hudson 700 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Lejeune v. Union Pacific Railroad 693 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Bower v. Jo Ellen Smith Convalescent Center 688 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Parker v. Centenary Heritage Manor 677 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Uriegas v. Gainsco, supra ; (La.App.
Uriegas v. Gainsco 663 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Nuckley v. Gail M. Woods, Inc. 654 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Detillier v. Smith 638 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Harig v. State, Bd. of Elementary & Secondary Educ. 635 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
However, in response to the State's argument in brief, we would point out that the $18,000 (La.App.
Brumfield v. Guilmino 633 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Frederick v. Woman's Hosp. of Acadiana 626 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Discretion Limited Essentially the same concerns articulated for giving latitude to trial judges in their factual findings justify leaving largely to their discretion the admission of cumulative evidence, (La.App.
Varnell v. Service Merchandise Co. 613 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Boulmay v. Dubois 593 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Roberts v. Benoit 574 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Newman v. Ellis 572 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
He relies on five cases as support for this contention: (La.App.
Crowther v. Kmart Corp. 568 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Wright v. Hirsch 556 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Searle v. Travelers Ins. Co. 557 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Gormley v. Grand Lodge of the State 506 So. 2d 1227 La. 1987
*1228 Prior report: La.App., .