Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canal Marine Supply, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corp., 522 So. 2d 1201.

19 citing documents.

Barkerding v. Whittaker 263 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Congregation of the Immaculate Conception Roman Catholic Church of the Parish of Calcasieu v. Sam Istre Constr., Inc. 253 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
See Canal Marine Supply, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corp. , (La.App.
Zeigler v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 118 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir.1991); Canal Marine Supply, (La.App.
Indest-Guidry, Ltd. v. Key Office Equipment, Inc. 997 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In Canal Marine Supply, (La.App.
Indest-Guidry, Ltd. v. Key Office Equipment, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In Canal Marine Supply, (La.App.
Miller v. Conagra, Inc. 991 So. 2d 445 La. 2008
App. 1 Cir. 12/10/98), ; Canal Marine Supply, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corp. of Waukegan, Ill., (La.App.
DOMINION EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION v. Waters 972 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Canal Marine Supply, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corp. of *357 Waukegan, Ill., (La.App.
Glod v. Baker 899 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The fourth circuit explored the impact of a continuing tort on the LUTPA peremption period in Canal Marine Supply, (La.App.
Walter A. Glod, Jr., M.D. v. W. Gregory Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The fourth circuit explored the impact of a continuing tort on the LUTPA peremption period in Canal Marine Supply, (La.App.
Morris v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 765 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir.1991); Canal Marine Supply, (La.App.
Capitol House v. PERRYMAN CONSULT., INC. 725 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 1992), writ not considered, Canal Marine Supply, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corporation of Waukegan, Illinois, -1204 (La.App.
Mayo v. Simon 646 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
1st Cir.), writ denied, Canal Marine Supply, (La.
Fox v. Dupree 633 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Canal Marine Supply, (La.App.
Monroe Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Hospital Corp. of Am. 622 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
The trial court agreed that the one-year limitation period is peremptive rather than prescriptive, (La.
Kuebler v. Martin 610 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
1 Cir.1990), writs denied at and Canal Marine Supply, (La.App.
Thibaut v. Thibaut 607 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Canal Marine Supply, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corporation of Waukegan, Illinois, (La.App.
Dufour v. US Home Corp. 581 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Jefferson v. State 573 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Spencer-Wallington, Inc. v. Service Merchandise 562 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990