Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Davezac v. Davezac, 483 So. 2d 1197.

21 citing documents.

M. B. v. T. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Equity dictates that [the spouse with exclusive use of a vehicle] be charged for the full amount of maintaining an asset of which he had exclusive use while that asset steadily declined in value.” (La.App.
Ostarly v. Ostarly 988 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Assignment of Error No. 2 Next, (La.App.
Mason v. Mason 927 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Moore v. Moore 917 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Donna C. Moore v. Charles L. Moore, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Equity dictates that [the spouse with exclusive use of a vehicle] be charged for the full amount of maintaining an asset of which he had exclusive use while that asset steadily declined in value.” (La.App.
Gill v. Gill 895 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Diane M. Sheridon, Born Richard v. Jonathan Sheridon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
5 Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
Sheridon v. Sheridon 867 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
5 Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
Stewart v. Stewart 728 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Gautreau v. Gautreau 697 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
App. 5 Cir.1984) (La.App.
Bergeron v. Bergeron 693 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
5 Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
Roque v. Tate 631 So. 2d 1385 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
App. 3rd Cir.1986); (La.App.
Guillaume v. Guillaume 603 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Williams v. Williams 590 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
3rd Cir. 1986); (La.App.
Criticized Oliver v. Oliver 561 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Dilley v. Dilley 561 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Plaintiff argues that such a (La.App.
Meyer v. Meyer 553 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Godwin v. Godwin 533 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Mara v. Mara 513 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Williams v. Williams 509 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
5th Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
Sellers v. Landry 489 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986