Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Long, 590 So. 2d 694.

16 citing documents.

State v. Office 967 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 4/2/97), , (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Brandon J. Office La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 4/2/97), (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. William L. Giles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 4/2/97), citing State v. Long (La.App.
State v. Giles 884 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 4/2/97), , (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Gary Dewayne Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Hamilton 867 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. King 692 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Coleman 673 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Bolden 680 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
2068 , 114 L.Ed.2d 472 (1991); (La.App.
State v. Johnson 670 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Guy 669 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Boudreaux 662 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
(3rd Cir. 1991) the court admitted the testimony of the defendant's stepdaughter, who was not the victim of the present charge, because it proved defendant's motive, plan, or general intent as it pertained to his daughter, and it provided strong, corroborative evidence of the victim's testimony.
State v. Broussard 649 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. DeRoche 629 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
(3rd Cir. 1991) the court admitted the testimony of the defendant's stepdaughter, who was not the victim of the present charge, because it proved defendant's motive, plan, or general intent as it pertained to his daughter, and it provided strong, corroborative evidence of the victim's testimony.
State v. Gaines 633 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Tyler 619 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993