Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 657 So. 2d 262.

23 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Ishmel Joel Ennis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Ennis 877 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Sylvia 845 So. 2d 358 La. 2003
App. 3 Cir. 5/17/95), ("Physical possession of an instrument with no utility other than the ingestion of crack cocaine is sufficient under the Jackson v. Virginia standard."); State v. McMooain, 95-2103 (La.App.
State v. Daggs 823 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
App. 3rd Cir.5/17/95), , the Third Circuit upheld a jury verdict for possession of cocaine based on a residue-containing crack pipe.
State v. Lipscomb 807 So. 2d 218 La. 2002
3rd Cir.5/17/95), ("Physical possession of an instrument with no utility other than the ingestion of crack cocaine is sufficient under the Jackson v. Virginia [ 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Jones 792 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
3 Cir. 5/17/95) , , the Court found that the evidence was sufficient to establish guilty knowledge where the defendant ran from the police and discarded the crack pipe during his flight.
State v. Knight 794 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
App. 3 Cir. 5/17/95), ] the State did not present evidence of the defendant displaying furtive behavior upon seeing Officer Rice.
State v. Bullock 766 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 5/17/95) , , the court concluded that the defendant's actions and possession of an object for which the only use was to smoke cocaine provided sufficient evidence to show that the defendant knowingly possessed cocaine.
State v. Monette 758 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 5/17/95) , ] the State did not present evidence of the defendant displaying furtive behavior upon seeing Officer Rice.
State v. Tassin 758 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 5/17/95) , , the court concluded that the defendant's actions and possession of an object the only use of which was to smoke cocaine provided sufficient evidence to show that the defendant knowingly possessed cocaine.
State v. Rice 758 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 5/17/95) , , the court concluded that the defendant’s actions and possession of an object that is used exclusively for smoking crack cocaine provided sufficient evidence to show that the defendant knowingly possessed cocaine.
State v. Drummer 750 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
App. 3 Cir. 5/17/95), ] the State did not present evidence of the defendant displaying furtive behavior upon seeing Officer Rice.
State v. Magee 749 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Gauthier 741 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Postell 735 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Wolfe 738 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Williams 732 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
App. 3 Cir. 5/17/95), , the court stated that physical possession of an instrument with no utility other than the ingestion of crack cocaine is sufficient to support a conviction for possession of cocaine.
State v. Lee 715 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Lewis 728 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 5/17/95) , , this court upheld the defendant's possession of cocaine conviction under facts similar to those in the present case.
State v. Chark 693 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
App. 3 Cir. 5/17/95); , two officers on patrol observed the defendant in an area known for drug activity.
State v. Gaines 688 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
3rd Cir. 5/17/95), , the court stated: "Physical possession of an instrument with no utility other than the ingestion of crack cocaine is sufficient under the Jackson v. Virginia, [ 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. McMooain 680 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
3rd Cir. 5/17/95); , (La.App.
State v. Clay 670 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by