Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bourque, 649 So. 2d 670.

33 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. David Anthony Burns La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), ), “[t]his court will overturn a jury’s credibility assessment only when a witness’s own testimony demonstrates that the witness’s ability to perceive events was impaired in some way.” In Bourque, 649 So.2d at 670, this court overturned the jury’s assessment of witness credibility after considering that one eyewitn
  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony Texada La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Marquez Wilson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Belsha La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles C. Keene La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Keene 230 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Jerry Vaughn Clifton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State v. Clifton 165 So. 3d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 11/2/94) , , wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Jarvis Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and the defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jerry Anthony Brandon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamario Kato La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State v. Kato 157 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 11/2/94) , , wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jason Lamounte Morgan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol 5 before the offense, the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white).
  • State of Louisiana v. Cleveland Troy Bias La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. M.S. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State v. Vallier 34 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 11/2/94) , , wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. Carey Vallier, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jimmy James Mack La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State v. Smith 984 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 11/2/94) , , wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Dwayne Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth E. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Tittle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Calvin Joseph Celestine, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. Nicholas Demond Pitree La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Pitree 930 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Hypolite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State of Louisiana v. David Lee Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), this court found the State did not present sufficient evidence to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, holding: Eyewitness testimony alone can be sufficient in some cases to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Hypolite 903 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 11/2/94) , , wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
  • State v. Leger 907 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    App. 3 Cir. 11/2/94), , this court found the State did not present sufficient evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, holding: Eyewitness testimony alone can be sufficient in some cases to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Rubin 899 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Jordie Kenry Rubin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Zeno 811 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 11/2/94) ; , this court set aside the defendant’s conviction because the two state eyewitnesses were clearly unreliable.
  • State v. James 761 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000