Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bourque, 649 So. 2d 670.
-
State of Louisiana v. David Anthony Burns
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3 Cir. 11/2/94), ), “[t]his court will overturn a jury’s credibility assessment only when a witness’s own testimony demonstrates that the witness’s ability to perceive events was impaired in some way.” In Bourque, 649 So.2d at 670, this court overturned the jury’s assessment of witness credibility after considering that one eyewitn
-
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Texada
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State of Louisiana v. Robert Marquez Wilson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Belsha
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
- State of Louisiana v. Charles C. Keene La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- State v. Keene 230 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
State of Louisiana v. Jerry Vaughn Clifton
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State v. Clifton
165 So. 3d 387
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 11/2/94) , , wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State of Louisiana v. Michael Jarvis Thomas
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and the defendant was white.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jerry Anthony Brandon
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jamario Kato
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State v. Kato
157 So. 3d 695
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 11/2/94) , , wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jason Lamounte Morgan
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol 5 before the offense, the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white).
-
State of Louisiana v. Cleveland Troy Bias
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State of Louisiana v. M.S. L.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State v. Vallier
34 So. 3d 1168
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 11/2/94) , , wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State of Louisiana v. Carey Vallier, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jimmy James Mack
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State v. Smith
984 So. 2d 238
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 11/2/94) , , wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Dwayne Smith
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
- State of Louisiana v. Kenneth E. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Tittle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State of Louisiana v. Calvin Joseph Celestine, II
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
- State of Louisiana v. Nicholas Demond Pitree La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. Pitree 930 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Hypolite
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 11/2/94), wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State of Louisiana v. David Lee Leger
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 11/2/94), this court found the State did not present sufficient evidence to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, holding: Eyewitness testimony alone can be sufficient in some cases to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
State v. Hypolite
903 So. 2d 1275
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 11/2/94) , , wherein one eyewitness had consumed a large amount of alcohol before the offense and the other was a minor who believed all white men looked alike, and defendant was white.
-
State v. Leger
907 So. 2d 739
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
App. 3 Cir. 11/2/94), , this court found the State did not present sufficient evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, holding: Eyewitness testimony alone can be sufficient in some cases to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
- State v. Rubin 899 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- State of Louisiana v. Jordie Kenry Rubin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
State v. Zeno
811 So. 2d 1222
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 11/2/94) ; , this court set aside the defendant’s conviction because the two state eyewitnesses were clearly unreliable.
- State v. James 761 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000