DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Morgan, 428 So. 2d 1215.

83 citing documents.

  • State v. Ezernack 496 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Prejean 496 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Dial 496 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    ” (citations omitted) (La.App.
  • State v. Sterling 496 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Miller 495 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Ortiz 495 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Sonnier 495 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    In reviewing a claim of excessive sentencing, the trial judge is to be afforded wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within statutory limits and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion.” (La.App.
  • State v. Dew 495 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Johnson 495 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    3 Cir.1983), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Kimmel 493 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Turner 493 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Stewart 492 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Tzuanos 491 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Vital 491 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Warren 490 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Rious 490 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Byrd 491 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Raby 487 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    We recently articulated the appellate review standard for determining whether a (La.
  • State v. Schoth 487 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Knippers 488 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Carter 485 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Dennison 482 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    ” , at page 1216 (La.App.
  • State v. Chance 480 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Harris 478 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    ” , at page 1216 (La.App.
  • State v. Cottingin 476 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. White 476 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Cox 474 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Freeman 474 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Smith 474 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    The contention after a guilty plea that the killing was actually done in self-defense is a (La.
  • State v. Cox 474 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Perry 472 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Richard 450 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Morgan 433 So. 2d 166 La. 1983