Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bernard, 441 So. 2d 817.
- State of Louisiana v. Martin G. Lemoine 222 So. 3d 688 La. 2017
- State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- State v. Hamilton 127 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- State of Louisiana v. Albert L. Arnold La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- State v. Arnold 124 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- State of Louisiana v. Shedrick Dewayne Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- State of Louisiana v. Darnell Savoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. Savoy 931 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- State v. Iron 780 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
- State v. Roberts 683 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- State v. Caldwell 616 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
-
State v. Simon
607 So. 2d 793
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
3d Cir.1987); State v. *802 Bernard, (La.App.
- State v. Washington 606 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Washington 606 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Brown 551 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Skaggs
551 So. 2d 831
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Batiste, supra; (La.App.
- State v. Thomas 546 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Heacox 543 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Rexrode 536 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. Baum 533 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- State v. Wiggins 518 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
- State v. Gordon 504 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
-
State v. McCullough
503 So. 2d 1194
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
40:967 A), a panel of this court, (La.App.
- State v. Hutchins 502 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Sterling 496 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Farris 491 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- State v. Lejeune 487 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
-
State v. Sampson
472 So. 2d 337
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
of a crime, whether present or absent, and whether they directly commit the act constituting the offense, aid and abet in its commission, or directly or indirectly counsel or procure another to commit the crime, are principals.” “Persons who aid and abet in the commission of a crime are guilty as principals although they do not directly commit the act constituting the offense.” (La.App.
- State v. Wiggins 465 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
State v. Picchini
463 So. 2d 714
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
In discussing the defense of entrapment, (La.App.
-
Maumus v. Dept. of Police, New Orleans
457 So. 2d 37
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
The considerations, in a defense of entrapment, as follows: Under the generally accepted view an entrapment is perpetrated when a law enforcement official or a person acting in cooperation with such an official for the purpose of obtaining evidence of the commission of an offense, solicits, encourages, *47 or otherwise induces another pers
-
State v. Bernard
445 So. 2d 439
La. 1984
In re Lawrence Bernard, applying for writ of certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR83-429; Parish of Acadia, 15th Judicial District Court, No. 35045, Section B. Case below: .