Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brogan, 453 So. 2d 325.

27 citing documents.

State v. Dominguez 148 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Terrance L. Sinegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Sinegal 97 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. R. K. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. R.K. 64 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Quentin Truehill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. TRUEHILL 38 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Moss 10 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State in the Interest of J. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Creamer 980 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Larry Allen Creamer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. McKinsey 779 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. *1001 Brogan, (La.App.
State v. Jones 773 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Guillory 773 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
* * * Although we are not required to address the second prong of the test for ineffective assistance of counsel, namely that the attorney's deficiency prejudiced the outcome of the trial, we feel it is important to note that defendant failed to couple his allegation with a (La.App.
State v. Clements 774 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Williams 735 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Rochon 733 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Davis 726 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Morris 719 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Collins 677 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Although we are not required to address the second prong of the test for ineffective assistance of counsel, namely that the attorney's deficiency prejudiced the outcome of the trial, we feel it is important to note that defendant failed to couple his allegation with a (La.App.
State v. James 670 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Cassell 540 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Prince 520 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Price 517 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
156 , 93 L.Ed.2d 96 (1986); (La.App.
State v. Nolan 503 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Martin 486 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
“The defenses available under a combined plea of ‘not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity’ shall be tried together.” (La.App.
State v. Brogan 457 So. 2d 1200 La. 1984