Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Perkins, 527 So. 2d 48.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Margaret Yvette Lee Barker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Bruce L. Lachney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Matthew Wayne McCauley v. Rowena Bautista McCauley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Edwin Paul Frinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
The issue of self-defense requires a dual inquiry: (1) an objective inquiry into whether the force used was reasonable under the circumstances; (2) a subjective inquiry into whether the force was apparently necessary, (La.App.
State v. Frinks 274 So. 3d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
The issue of self-defense requires a dual inquiry: (1) an objective inquiry into whether the force used was reasonable under the circumstances; (2) a subjective inquiry into whether the force was apparently necessary, (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Demetrice Dontrell Welch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Barron 243 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
1994) ; State v. Perkins , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Dwane Edward Fox La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Fox 184 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
ustifiable when “committed in self-defense by one who reasonably believes that he is in imminent danger of losing his life or receiving great bodily harm and that the killing is necessary to save himself from that danger.” - When a defendant in a homicide case claims self-defense, the State must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the-'defendant did not act in self-defense, (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Lantibious A. Broussard AKA Lantipious A. Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 5/7/08), (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Vaschon S. Blount La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir.1992), writ denied, 93-0051 (La.11/11/94); [State v.] Perkins, [(La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Derrick Baker, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Baker 986 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Brown 868 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 11/25/98) , -1105 , writ denied, 98-3219 (La.5/7/99), ; (La.App.
State v. Charles 787 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. McBride 773 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
The issue of self-defense requires a dual inquiry: (1) an objective inquiry into whether the force used was reasonable under the circumstances; (2) a subjective inquiry into whether the force was apparently necessary, (La.
State v. Callegari 773 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Joubert 705 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
The issue of self-defense requires a dual inquiry: (1) an objective inquiry into whether the force used was reasonable under the circumstances; (2) a subjective inquiry into whether the force was apparently necessary, (La.App.
State v. Fluker 618 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Hall 606 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
The issue of self-defense requires a dual *974 inquiry: (1) an objective inquiry into whether the force used was reasonable under the circumstances; (2) a subjective inquiry into whether the force was apparently necessary, (La.
State v. Barnes 590 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Willis 591 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991