Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Stone, 615 So. 2d 38.

13 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Sidney John Handy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Handy 154 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Arthur Bias, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Bias 63 So. 3d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State in the Interest of S.C. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Louisiana Revised Statutes 15:438 provides “[t]he rule as to circumstantial evidence is: assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.” (La.App.
State Ex Rel. Scj 28 So. 3d 1206 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State ex rel. S.C.J. 28 So. 3d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Louisiana Revised Statutes 15:438 provides “[t]he rule as to circumstantial evidence is: assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.” (La.App.
State v. Ordodi 916 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Leslie Otto Ordodi La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
To prove the offense of attempted armed robbery, the state is required “to prove that the defendant 1) had a specific intent to commit the crime of armed robbery, and 2) did an act for the purpose of and tending directly toward the commission of the crime of armed robbery.” (La.App.
State v. Debrow 810 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
4th Cir.9/15/99), ; (La.App.
State v. Young 800 So. 2d 847 La. 2001
State v. Allen 793 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. McNeal 785 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001