Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Readoux, 614 So. 2d 175.

29 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Gary L. Workman La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State v. Gallagher 274 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Jose Isreal Ayala, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Ayala 244 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Readoux , (La.App.
State ex rel. Weldon v. State 201 So. 3d 885 La. 2016
State of Louisiana v. John Wesley Billiot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Billiot 135 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Millard Irby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
―It is well settled that if a defendant‘s misunderstanding is not induced by or attributed to representations made by the district attorney or the trial court, there is no ground for invalidating the guilty plea.‖ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Shane Welch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
“[A] misunderstanding between a defendant and counsel for defendant does not have the same implication as a breached plea bargain agreement, and this misunderstanding does not render the guilty plea invalid.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Darryl Boudreaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Boudreaux 11 So. 3d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Melvin Sigue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. David Lemelle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2/10/06), (citations omitted), (-77 (La.App.
State v. Sigue 940 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Roy D. Roe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Roe 903 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Carol M. Hughes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Hughes 865 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Hoover 785 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Moree 772 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Senterfitt 771 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Walton 738 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Jordan 716 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
As referenced in Hidalgo, a panel of this court explained in State v. *42 Readoux, (La.App.
State v. Landry 711 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 11/6/96); (emphasis omitted) ( (La.
State v. Bernard 702 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Vaurigaud 690 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Hidalgo 684 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Johnson 666 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Hall 637 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994