DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Roberson, 664 So. 2d 687.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. Lampton 249 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 3 Cir. 11/02/95), , 692 ).
  • State v. Ceasar 224 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Joseph 205 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Kent 178 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Wilt 170 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS HAROLD OZENE A/K/A JAMIE OZENE A/K/A HAROLD J. BOOTE A/K/A HAROLD J. OZENE A/K/A … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS H. O. AKA J.O., AKA H.J.B, AKA H.J.O., AKA H.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 11/2/95), this court reversed a habitual offender adjudication, concluding that the proceeding was not fundamentally fair because the defendant was not advised of his right to remain silent and because the State failed to introduce independent evidence of his identity before he admitted his status as a habitual offender.
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS OTERREL J. BOUTTE AKA O'TERREL BOUTTE, AKA O'TERRELL BOUTTE, ETC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 11/2/95), this court reversed a habitual offender adjudication, concluding that the proceeding was not fundamentally fair when the defendant was not advised of his right to remain silent and the state failed to introduce independent evidence of his identity before he admitted to his status as a habitual offender.
  • State v. Boutte 27 So. 3d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 11/2/95) , , this court reversed a habitual offender adjudication, concluding that the proceeding was not fundamentally fair when the defendant was not advised of his right to remain silent and the state failed to introduce independent evidence of his identity before he admitted to his status as a habitual offender.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Quinn, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 11/2/95), that a defendant is not afforded a fundamentally fair hearing where he is not advised of his rights and no proof other than his own admission is offered to prove his status as a multiple offender.
  • State v. Fletcher 776 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 11/2/95) ; , reversed an habitual offender adjudication, concluding that the proceeding was not fundamentally fair when the defendant was not advised of his right to remain silent and the state failed to introduce independent evidence of his identity before he admitted to his status as an habitual offender.
  • State v. Coleman 720 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Boswell 689 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997