Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Payne, 677 So. 2d 527.

16 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Colby James Kinsey A/K/A Colby J. Kinsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Bishop Slade Dubroc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Bishop Slade Dubroc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Dubroc 261 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Dubroc 261 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Cleveland Troy Bias La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Lionel Paul Dugas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 5/22/96), this court found the defendant’s hearing was fundamentally fair, thus, the error lacked merit.
State v. Hart 66 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Boutte 27 So. 3d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/22/96) , , this court found the defendant’s hearing was fundamentally fair, thus, the error lacked merit.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS OTERREL J. BOUTTE AKA O'TERREL BOUTTE, AKA O'TERRELL BOUTTE, ETC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/22/96), this court found the defendant’s hearing was fundamentally fair, thus, the error lacked merit.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Samuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/22/96), -30, on error patent review, this court explained in pertinent part: defendant was determined by the trial court to be a habitual offender and sentenced to 4 twenty-four years at hard labor.
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/22/96), this court recognized as an error patent the trial court’s failure to advise the defendant of his right to remain silent prior to pleading guilty to his multiple offender status.
State v. Samuel 984 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
App. 3 Cir. 5/22/96), -30 , on error patent review, this court explained in pertinent part: defendant was determined by the trial court to be a habitual offender and sentenced to twenty-four years at hard labor.
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Quinn, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 5/22/96), the admission on the part of the defendant was a part of a plea agreement.
State v. Fletcher 776 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 5/22/96) ; , this court reached the conclusion that a proceeding was fundamentally fair even though the defendant was not advised of his right to remain silent in an habitual offender adjudication and despite the fact *1244 that the only evidence of his multiple offender status was his own admission.
State v. Boswell 689 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
3 Cir. 5/22/96) , , we held Harris also applies to appeals.