Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Colligan, 679 So. 2d 184.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Joshua Jerome Ball La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Ball 209 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Broome 136 So. 3d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Patterson, 2011-892 (La.App.3d Cir.2/1/12), , writ denied, 2012-0526 (La.6/1/12), ; State v. Walker, 97-1180 (La.App.3d Cir.3/6/98), ; State v. Colligan, 95-880 (La.App.3d Cirj8/7/96),15 .
State of Louisiana v. Robert James Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Thomas 114 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Boudoin 106 So. 3d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Michael D. Patterson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Patterson 83 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Massey 71 So. 3d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Cooper 935 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3d Cir.8/7/96), , wherein (albeit in the context of a prosecutor's closing argument) the court held that the attempt by the prosecutor to convey the message that the jury represented "the people of Evangeline Parish" was improper.
State v. Glenn 900 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Ellis 880 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
3d Cir.08/07/96), (grandfather while victim spent the night at his home); Doe v. Doe, 95-0478 (La.App.
Distinguished State v. Boudreaux 782 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Johnson 775 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Simmons 759 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 8/7/96), , the court addressed the defendant’s complaint that the judge improperly commented on the evidence despite the failure of the defendant to object at trial.
State v. Wells 755 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 8/7/96) ; , 189 held that a prosecutor's comments to a jury that they "represent the people of Evangeline Parish and ...
State v. Hotoph 750 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Zeno 742 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
App. 3 Cir.8/7/96), , where the trial judge read the bill of information to the jury as part of a jury charge without informing the jury that he was only reading from the bill of information.
State v. Watts 746 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 8/7/96) , ), this Court noted that "the Supreme Court has held that despite lack of timely objection by defense counsel to the prosecutor's closing argument, if the remarks are extremely inflammatory and prejudicial, then a reversal is required."
State v. Rochon 733 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
3 Cir.8/7/96), , where the Third Circuit Court of Appeal reviewed both a trial judge's and a prosecutor's remarks absent objections at the trial level.
State v. Davis 726 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 8/7/96) , , held that there were limited exceptions to the application of Article 841 and reviewed both a trial judge’s and a prosecutor’s remarks absent objections at the trial level.
State v. Walker 710 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998