DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Taylor, 688 So. 2d 1262.

26 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Elizabeth Marie Alfred A/K/A Elizabeth Alfred La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana v. Sherman R. Bell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/5/97), this court addressed a situation in which the State provided the defendant with photographs depicting the victim’s injuries the day before trial.
  • State v. Broussard 149 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. David Lynn Saucier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Saucier 81 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Jason Allen Lomax La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/5/97), -69: The elements of the crime of conspiracy are (1) an agreement or combination of two or more persons for the specific purpose of committing a crime, plus (2) an act done in furtherance of the object of the agreement or combination.
  • State of Louisiana v. D D La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. DD 34 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Montgomery 974 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Powell 968 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Kendall Milton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Milton 939 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Lee 888 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    3d Cir.2/5/97), ; State v. Ramirez, 96-302 (La.App.
  • State v. Hampton 865 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Jack 829 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    App. 3 Cir. 2/5/97); , this court addressed witness credibility when it stated: A determination of the weight of evidence presented is a question of fact.
  • State v. Prudhomme 829 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Helou 822 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 2/5/97); (citations omitted).
  • State v. Dabney 809 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    App. 3 Cir. 2/5/97); , this court held: A determination of the weight of evidence presented is a question of fact.
  • State v. Mitchell 815 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 2/5/97); , a panel of this court addressed witness credibility, stating: A determination of the weight of evidence presented is a question of fact.
  • State v. Oxley 802 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 2/5/97) ; , this court held: A determination of the weight of evidence presented is a question of fact.
  • State v. Charles 787 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 2/5/97) ; : A determination of the weight of evidence presented is a question of fact.
  • State v. Kendrick 779 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 2/5/97) , (confusing R.S.
  • State v. Callegari 773 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    3 Cir.1997); , this court has also held that: A determination of the weight of evidence presented is a question of fact.
  • State v. Jones 741 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Smith 737 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 2/5/97); , 1267 this court stated: A fact finder’s discretion will be impinged upon only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.
  • State v. Dunn 709 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 2/5/97) , ; Jackson v. Virginia, supra, 443 U.S. at 307 , 99 S.Ct.