Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kennerson, 695 So. 2d 1367.

554 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Hypolite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Hypolite 903 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Rubin 899 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Jordie Kenry Rubin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Sherry S. Bailey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Devrin P. Doucette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Doucette 899 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Bailey 905 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Touchet, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Touchet 897 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Hensley 900 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Carey Louis Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Hood 895 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Smith 897 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. John M. Benedict La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. Carvin Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Benedict 887 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Smith 887 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. William L. Giles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Giles 884 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. Kiley M. Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Williams 878 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Stein 874 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. Gary Dewayne Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Hamilton 867 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. Scott Allen Cooper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/7/97), : When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven
State v. Cooper 862 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/7/97), , 1371: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/7/97), this court explained: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of
State v. Ross 861 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/7/97), , this court explained: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a
State of Louisiana v. William Odell Cash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Cash 861 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State of Louisiana v. Chet K. Whatley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Whatley 858 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State of Louisiana v. Felton Cofield Bey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Bey 857 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Touchet 847 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/7/97), , appeal after remand, 97-1682 (La.App.
State v. McLeod 843 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Jones 839 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/7/97); , appeal after remand, 97-1682 (La.App.
State v. Paddio 832 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Jackson 828 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 5/7/97) , -80 (finding defendant’s burglary of one victim’s truck was a separate “criminal episode” completed before defendant drove to another victim’s home and participated in a separate “criminal episode”).
State v. McMillan 819 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Zeno 811 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 5/7/97); , appeal after remand, 97-1682 (La.App.
State v. Kennerson 817 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Groce 786 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
3 Cir. 5/7/97); (citations omitted), said: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyon
State v. McBride 773 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
App. 3 Cir. 5/7/97); , appeal after remand, 97-1682 (La.App.
State v. Wommack 770 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Donald 745 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
3d Cir.5/7/97), has also held that out-of-state documents | ¿require either official seal or multiple attestations under Acts of Congress, citing La.
State v. Etienne 734 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Owens 719 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. President 715 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
App. 3 Cir. 5/7/97); , we held the following regarding recognition of another state's laws: First, although La.R.S.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by