Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kennerson, 695 So. 2d 1367.

554 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. John Prince La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Brian A. Verret La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Marcus James Jason La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Verret 9 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Jason 9 So. 3d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Batiste, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Batiste 5 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Henry Leo Eaglin, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Eaglin 4 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Jacobs 6 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Mason N. Godfrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Godfrey 4 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. CSD 4 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 5/7/97); (citations omitted), said: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyon
State of Louisiana v. Steven Mark Marc" Anderson " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. C.S.D. & E.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 5/7/97); (citations omitted), said: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Paul Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 5/7/97), this court discussed the standard of review to be used in addressing a sufficiency review: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution
State v. Jacobs 2 So. 3d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 5/7/97), , this court discussed the standard of review to be used in addressing a sufficiency review: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact
State v. Anderson 2 So. 3d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. RD 997 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. R. D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. E. J. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. EJF 999 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. E.J.F. 999 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Baylor 998 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/7/97) , , and State v. Ward, 94-490 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Felton Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Melvin Tassin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Jimmy James Mack La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Tassin 997 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Heath Edward Fusilier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/7/97), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Gregory P. Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/7/97), (citations omitted).
State v. Fusilier 993 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/7/97), (citations omitted).
State in the Interest of D. A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State ex rel. D. A. 995 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State Ex Rel. Da 995 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State in the Interest of D.J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State ex rel. D.J. 995 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State Ex Rel. Dj 995 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Timothy E. Robertson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/7/97), this court set forth the standard of review to be used by appellate courts in addressing a sufficiency review: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light m
State v. Robertson 988 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/7/97), , this court set forth the standard of review to be used by appellate courts in addressing a sufficiency review: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most 1 afavorable to the prosecution, any
State of Louisiana v. Randall C. Curtis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Robert Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Curtis 987 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Jacobs 987 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith 984 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Samuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Dwayne Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Samuel 984 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Timothy G. Falcucci La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Falcucci 982 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Herbert Lee Prejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008