DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Goodman, 684 So. 2d 58.

18 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. David Billy Parker, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    3 Cir. 11/6/96), that a defendant may not seek review of his sentence “when a specific sentence or sentencing range is agreed to by both parties as part of a plea agreement[] and is judicially recognized at the sentencing hearing.” Defendant has also filed a pro se supplemental brief, in which he submits a filing title
  • State of Louisiana v. Jahnural Oshay Durham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
  • State of Louisiana v. Dale Wadric Winters La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Jordan Carambat La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert N. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 11/6/96), ).1 Here, Defendant and the State jointly recommended the sentence that the trial court imposed.
  • State of Louisiana v. Chad Michael Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Cornelius Eugene Wilson AKA N.O. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Wilson 135 So. 3d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Gerald Lamont Kimble La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Kimble 153 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Jupiter 934 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 11/6/96) , -63 , defendant entered the home of an elderly couple and encountered the female victim who screamed, which alerted the woman's husband.
  • State v. Burton 746 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 11/6/96) , , the court affirmed the defendant's sentence of sixty-six months for unauthorized entry into an inhabited dwelling.
  • State v. Pickens 741 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 11/6/96); , 61 and concluded: The "cap" discussed at sentencing was a clarification of the law for Goodman's benefit, not a reference to a specific term deemed part of the plea agreement.
  • State v. Underwood 724 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 11/6/96) ; , a panel of this court concluded that Article 881.2(A)(2) applied only in circumstances where a specific sentence or a specific sentencing range was agreed upon and not where a defendant merely pled guilty to a reduced offense.
  • State v. Coco 723 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Gobert 720 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 11/6/96) ; , a panel of this court found that Article 881.2(A)(2) applies only in a situation where a specific sentence or sentencing range is part of the plea agreement.
  • State v. Jordan 716 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    App. 3 Cir. 11/6/96); , a panel of this court concluded that Article 881.2(A)(2) applied only in circumstances where a specific sentence or a specific sentencing range was agreed upon and not where a defendant merely pled guilty to a reduced offense.
  • State v. Watkins 700 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997