Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brack, 758 So. 2d 310.

15 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Travis Joseph Reno La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 3/1/00), overruled on other grounds by State v. Stevens, 06-818 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Cody Lane Crittenden La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 3/1/00), State v. Thomas, 05- 1051 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Catrina L. Wallace La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 3/1/00), overruled on other grounds by State v. Stevens, 06-818 (La.App.
State v. Wallace 153 So. 3d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 3/1/00) , , overruled on other grounds by State v. Stevens, 06-818 (La.App.
Overruled State of Louisiana v. Brian A. Verret La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Therefore, we overrule this court’s
Overruled State v. Verret 9 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In taking 114advantage of this assistance, the trial court in no way cedes its responsibility to impose the payment plan, and it only becomes effective upon approval of the trial court Therefore, we overrule this *1120 court’s .
State of Louisiana v. Mikala L. January La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/1/00), (restitution, IDB fees, fines, and costs), State in the Interest of J.M., 06-624 (La.App.
State v. January 993 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/1/00) , (restitution, IDB fees, fines, and costs), State in the Interest of J.M., 06-624 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Albert Stevens, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/1/00), State v. Thomas, 05-1051 (La.App.
State v. Stevens 949 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/1/00) , ; State v. Thomas, 05-1051 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. J. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. JM 941 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. J.M. 941 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Steven R. Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/1/00), this court found that such a statement was insufficient to establish a payment plan: Additionally, the trial court ordered that Defendant’s payment of restitution to David Cabra, fees to the Indigent Defender Board, his fines and court costs be made “pursuant to a
State v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/1/00) , , this court found that such a statement was insufficient to establish a payment plan: Additionally, the trial court ordered that Defendant's payment of restitution to David Cabra, fees to the Indigent Defender *1152 Board, his fines and court costs be made "pursuant to a pay plan set up and approved through the proba