Pat Swido and Tommie Swido v. Lafayette Insurance Company
Pat Swido and Tommie Swido v. Lafayette Insurance Company, No. CW-0005-0043 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Nov. 2, 2005).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
CW 05-43
consolidated with CW 04-1674
PAT SWIDO AND TOMMIE SWIDO
VERSUS
LAFAYETTE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.
************
SUPERVISORY WRITS FROM THE
TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,
PARISH OF AVOYELLES, NO. 2000-783,
HONORABLE MARK A. JEANSONNE, DISTRICT JUDGE
************
MICHAEL G. SULLIVAN
JUDGE
************
Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux, Chief Judge, Michael G. Sullivan, and
Elizabeth A. Pickett, Judges.
WRITS GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY.
Russell L. Potter
Andrew Parker Texada
Stafford, Stewart & Potter
Post Office Box 1711
Alexandria, Louisiana 71309
(318) 487-4910
Counsel for Defendants/Applicants:
Lafayette Insurance Company
Erica Gaillard
Mark Gaillard
Raymond L. Brown, Jr.
Steven M. Oxenhandler
Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell
Post Office Box 6118
Alexandria, Louisiana 71307-6118
(318) 445-6471
Counsel for Defendant/Respondent:
Miki Gaillard
Edgar John Litchfield
Attorney at Law
400 Poydras Street, Suite 2000
New Orleans, Louisiana 70130
(504) 568-0541
Counsel for Intervenor/Respondent:
Charity Hospital & Medical Center of Louisiana
Robert Hairford
Attorney at Law
219 Europe Street
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802
(225) 267-6786
Counsel for Respondent:
Estate of Herman Hairford
Christopher J. Roy, Sr.
Timothy D. Shumate
Roy Law Office
Post Office Box 1911
Alexandria, Louisiana 71309-1911
(381) 487-9537
Counsel for Plaintiffs/Respondents:
Pat Swido
Tommie Swido
SULLIVAN, Judge.
For the reasons assigned in Pat Swido, et al. v. Lafayette Insurance Co., et al.,
04-1674 (La.App. 3 Cir. __/__/05), ___ So.2d ___, Defendants’ writ applications are
granted; the trial court’s denial of summary judgment is reversed; summary judgment
is granted in favor of Miki Gaillard, Mark and Erica Gaillard, and Lafayette Insurance
Company, and the Swidos’ claims against these defendants are dismissed with
prejudice. All costs associated with these writ applications are assessed to the
Swidos.