CW-0008-1161 Nonprecedential Processed

Wilson Chase Long v. Amy Lazarus

Louisiana Court of Appeal, Third Circuit · Filed November 5, 2008

Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., April 29, 2009

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

680 So. 2d 167 not in our corpus

Opinion text

STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
P.O. Box 16577
Lake Charles LA 70616
(337) 433-9403

Philip Allan LeTard
Attorney at Law
P. O. Box 187
Vidalia LA 71373

REHEARING ACTION: November 5, 2008

Docket Number: 08 01161-CW

WILSON CHASE LONG
VERSUS
AMY LAZARUS

Writ Application from Avoyelles Parish Case No. 2007-1096 H

BEFORE JUDGES:

Hon. John D. Saunders
Hon. Jimmie C. Peters
Hon. Marc T. Amy

As counsel of record in the captioned case, you are hereby notified that the application

for rehearing filed by Amy Lazarus has this day been

GRANTED (See Per Curiam)

cc: Cory Paul Roy, Counsel for the Respondent

p. 2

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

08-1161

WILSON CHASE LONG

VERSUS

AMY LAZARUS

************

ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FROM THE
TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF AVOYLLES, NO. 2007-1096 H
HONORABLE MARK A. JEANSONNE, DISTRICT JUDGE

************

PER CURIAM

************

Court composed of John D. Saunders, Jimmie C. Peters, and Marc T. Amy,
Judges.

REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

Philip A. Letard
Attorney at Law
109 Carter Street
Vidalia, LA 71373
(318) 336-8990
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPLICANT:
Amy Lazarus

Cory Paul Roy
Attorney at Law
Post Office Box 544
Marksville, LA 71351
(318) 240-7800
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT:
Wilson Chase Long

p. 3

PER CURIAM.

The applicant has filed a motion for reconsideration of this court’s denial of the

relator’s supervisory writ application based on the untimely filing of the writ

application. In her motion for reconsideration, the applicant alleges that certain

representations were made off the record indicating that a written judgment was

contemplated. See Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573 (La.10/4/96), 680 So.2d 167. Because

the applicant is relying on representations not of record, in the interest of justice, we

remand this matter to the trial court for hearing to determine whether a written

judgment was contemplated.

REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION.
Rule 2-16.3 Uniform Rules, Court of Appeal.

p. 4