Derrick Dean, M.D. v. St. Mary Emergency Group, LLC
Derrick Dean, M.D. v. St. Mary Emergency Group, LLC, No. CW-0016-1064 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. May 17, 2017).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
16-1064 consolidated with 17-66
DERRICK DEAN, M.D.
VERSUS
ST. MARY EMERGENCY GROUP, LLC, ET AL.
**********
ON APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY WRITS FROM THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. 2015-5856
HONORABLE DAVID MICHAEL SMITH, DISTRICT JUDGE
**********
SHANNON J. GREMILLION
JUDGE
**********
Court composed of Shannon J. Gremillion, John E. Conery, and David E.
Chatelain, Judges.1
WRIT CONSOLIDATED WITH APPEAL.
Regel Louis Bisso
Robert G. Miller,Jr.
Bisso & Miller
3925 N.I-10 Service Road, West, #227
Metairie, LA 70002
(504) 830-3401
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT:
Derrick Dean, M.D.
1
Honorable David E. Chatelain participated in this decision by appointment of the
Louisiana Supreme Court as Judge Pro Tempore.
R. Joshua Koch, Jr.
Koch & Schmidt, LLC
650 Poydras Street, Suite 2660
New Orleans, LA 70130
(504) 208-9040
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT:
Derrick Dean, M.D.
James L. Pate
Kenneth W. Jones, Sr.
Neuner Pate
P.O. Drawer 52828
Lafayette, LA 70505-2828
(337) 237-7000
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
Westport Insurance Corporation
Celia R. Cangelosi
Attorney at Law
5551 Corporate Boulevard, #101
Baton Rouge, LA 70821-3036
(225) 231-1453
COUNSEL FOR OTHER APPLICANT:
Louisiana Board of Pharmacy
James Huey Gibson
Stacy Nicole Kennedy
Allen & Gooch
P. O. Box 81129
Lafayette, LA 70598-1129
(337) 291-1000
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/ RESPONDENTS:
The Gachassin Law Firm
Julie Ann SLisa Eve Mayer
Sara R. Buggs
NeunerPate
P. O. Drawer 52828
Lafayette, LA 70505-2828
(337) 237-7000
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
Westport Insurance Corporation
GREMILLION, Judge.
The Louisiana Board of Pharmacy (the Board) filed a supervisory writ in
this matter. Thereafter, the Board filed an appeal in 17-66. Both sought the
reversal of the trial court’s motion to compel the Board to provide information to
the defendants-appellees, the Gachassin Law Firm and Julie Ann Savoy
(Gachassin). Gachassin filed a motion to dismiss the writ application, which we
denied. We granted the writ application for the limited purpose of ordering the
consolidation of the writ with the appeal. We affirm the trial court’s ruling as set
forth in the opinion rendered in in 17-66.
WRIT CONSOLIDATED WITH APPEAL.
1