Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lisenby, 534 So. 2d 996.

17 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Joseph Dewayne Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
1 The jurisprudence states that “committing a prisoner to the Department of Corrections is necessarily at hard labor.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Cody Nicholas Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Chase Gee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Elvin D. Villafranca La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
App. 5 Cir. 9/28/04); ( (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Argentina Mesa La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
App. 5 Cir. 9/28/04); ( (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Delcome David Evans La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
App. 5 Cir. 9/28/04), ( (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Elvin D. Villafranca La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 9/28/04); ( (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Argentina Mesa La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 9/28/04); ( (La.
State v. Daniels 275 So. 3d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 9/28/04), (citing State v. Lisenby , , 998 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Sherman R. Bell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
In imposing Defendant’s sentence, the court stated, “I will order you to serve five years and six months without hard labor in the Department of Corrections.” “[A] sentence committing a prisoner to the Department of Corrections is necessarily at hard labor.” (La.App.
State v. Untereiner 82 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 9/28/04) ; , (citing State v. Lisenby (La.App.
State v. Wilson 77 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 9/28/04) ; , (citing, State v. Lisenby (La.App.
State v. Whatley 943 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Lawson 885 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Lisenby (La.App.
State ex rel. Fortune v. State 798 So. 2d 953 La. 2001
Rochon v. Blackburn 727 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
In accordance with Louisiana Revised Statutes 15:824(C), “only individuals actually sentenced to death or confinement at hard labor shall be committed to the Department of Corrections.” (La.App.
State v. Laviolette 576 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991