Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Love, 602 So. 2d 1014.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. John J. Landry III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Willis J. Mouton AKA Willis James Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
In Stamps, the fifth circuit stated the following: This Court has previously reviewed the cases cited above [ (La.App.
State v. Mouton 129 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In Stamps, the fifth circuit stated the following: This Court has previously reviewed the cases cited above [ (La.App.
State v. Stamps 960 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Larry Surratt and Cynthia Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Surratt 932 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2 Cir. 1/25/02), , writ denied, 02-1622 (La.5/16/03), ; (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. William L. Giles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Giles 884 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. Damian S. Burgess La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
14:10(1) states that specific criminal intent is “that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.” (La.App.
State v. Burgess 876 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Gobert 865 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State of Louisiana v. Steven D. Gobert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Denham 804 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Wilson 806 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
This court has recently reiterated the analysis of double jeopardy claims: The rule concerning a claim of double jeopardy arising from a single chain of events, as in this case, (La.App.
State v. Arnold 801 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Distinguished State v. Jones 772 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
5th Cir. 9/14/94), ; (La.App.
State v. Texada 756 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Texada 734 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
This court set forth the rule concerning a claim of double jeopardy arising from a -1020 (La.App.
State v. Cole 702 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
The rule concerning a claim of double jeopardy arising from a (La.App.
State v. Thomas 680 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
This court set forth the rule concerning a claim of double jeopardy arising from a -1020 (La.App.
State v. Holmes 653 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
App. 2nd Cir.1992) writ denied, (La.App.
State v. Meyers 643 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994