State of Louisiana in the Interest of S. K.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

17-275

STATE IN THE INTEREST OF

S.K.

************
APPEAL FROM THE
LAFAYETTE CITY COURT
PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. JC201600182
HONORABLE DOUGLAS J. SALOOM, CITY COURT JUDGE

************
JOHN D. SAUNDERS
JUDGE

************

Court composed of John D. Saunders, Elizabeth A. Pickett, and Shannon J.
Gremillion, Judges.

APPEAL DISMISSED. THE JUVENILE-
APPELLANT IS PERMITTED TO FILE AN
APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY WRITS
WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS FROM THE DATE
OF THIS DECISION.

Keith A. Stutes
District Attorney - 15th Judicial District
Tracey Davenport-McGraw, ADA
P. O. Box 3306
Lafayette, LA 70502-3306
(337) 232-5170
COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE:
State of Louisiana

Daniel Ginnetty
Attorney, 15th Judicial PDO
P. O. Box 3622
Lafayette, LA 70502
(337) 232-9345
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT:
S.K.

Saunders, Judge.
On January 12, 2017, the Juvenile-Appellant, S.K., was adjudicated

delinquent for theft of a thing valued at $44.17, a violation of La.R.S. 14:67. 1 On

February 15, 2017, the Juvenile-Appellant’s attorney filed a “MOTION FOR ART.

896 DEFERRED DISPOSTION AGREEMENT” and a “MOTION FOR POST-

VERDICT JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL” with the juvenile court. The Juvenile-

Appellant’s attorney requested in the motion for a deferred disposition that the

Juvenile be placed on unsupervised probation, to complete twenty hours of

community service, and to write a five-page report. The Juvenile-Appellant’s

attorney asserted in the motion for post-verdict judgment of acquittal that because

the State failed to prove every element of its case beyond a reasonable doubt, the

Juvenile court should set aside the adjudication and enter a judgment of acquittal.

An evidentiary hearing was held on the motions on February 16, 2017, at which

the juvenile court denied the “MOTION FOR POST-VERDICT JUDGMENT OF

ACQUITTAL” and granted the “MOTION FOR ART. 896 DEFERRED

DISPOSTION AGREEMENT.” As a result, the Juvenile was placed on

unsupervised probation for a term of six months, along with the following general

and special conditions:

1) Shall refrain from criminal conduct and exhibit good behavior
and obey her parents/guardian, including obedience to a curfew
which is to be set from 4:30 PM to 7:30 AM;

2) Shall continue to attend school regularly and to maintain good
grades and to obey her teachers and school officials. Shall
complete (1) hour school work every night and furnish a copy
of her report card to the Court. If she is not currently registered
for school, shall obtain a GED within one year;

3) Shall perform (20) hours of free, charitable community service
work within (90) days;

1
Initials are being used pursuant to Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 5-2.

4) Shall not carry a weapon on her person or in her vehicle and
shall not associate with others involved in this incident or with
any other known delinquents;

5) Shall not drink alcohol or frequent bars; use or take any drugs
(unless prescribed to her); be around drugs or known drug
users; shall submit to and pay for random drug screens;

6) Must enroll in and complete cognitive behavioral therapy or
counseling.

IT WAS FURTHER ORDERED that the sentence in the above
captioned matter be STAYED pending an appeal in the Third Circuit
Court of Appeal. A status hearing was set for May 4, 2017.

On February 16, 2017, the Juvenile-Appellant’s attorney filed a “MOTION

FOR APPEAL and DESIGNATION OF RECORD” with the juvenile court. On

the same date, the juvenile court granted the notice with a return date of April 6,

2017.

On March 21, 2017, this court lodged the appeal record. On March 30,

2017, this court issued a rule to show cause why the appeal should not be

dismissed, as the judgment at issue is not an appealable judgment. See La. Code

Crim.P. art. 912(A) and (C)(1).

On April 20, 2017, the Juvenile-Appellant’s attorney filed a brief in support

of appellate jurisdiction, asserting that “an Article 896 Deferred Dispositional

Agreement (DDA) order constitutes a judgment of disposition and should be

considered a final judgment of the juvenile court, appealable under Children’s

Code Article 330.” The Juvenile-Appellant’s attorney also asserts, “In the

alternative, S.K. moves this Honorable Court for leave to file application for

supervisory writs within a reasonable time, so that she can allege error by the

juvenile court in denying her motion for post-verdict judgment of acquittal.”

2

Louisiana Children’s Code Article 330(B) provides, in pertinent part, “In

delinquency proceedings . . . an appeal may be taken only after a judgment of

disposition.” The juvenile court deferred disposition in the present case pursuant

to La.Ch.Code art. 896. Since disposition has been deferred, no disposition has

been imposed. Consequently, we hereby dismiss the Juvenile-Appellant’s appeal.

The Juvenile-Appellant is hereby permitted to file a proper application for

supervisory writs, in compliance with Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 4,

no later than fifteen days from the date of this decision. The Juvenile-Appellant is

not required to file a notice of intent to seek writs nor obtain an order setting a

return date pursuant to Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 5-3(d), as we

hereby construe the motion for appeal as a timely-filed notice of intent to seek a

supervisory writ.

APPEAL DISMISSED. THE JUVENILE-APPELLANT IS PERMITTED

TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY WRITS WITHIN

FIFTEEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS DECISION.

3