State v. Daigle
State v. Daigle, 593 So. 2d 676 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991).
Cited by
- State of Louisiana v. Carlos Anthony Toby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
- State of Louisiana Versus Jerel Smith La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
- Christina Lambert Versus Christopher Stinson, Warden, Louisiana Transitional Center for Women La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Larry William Loya La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- Richard Benoit Versus Kirt Guerin, Warden Elayn Hunt Correctional Center La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
- State v. Clark 263 So. 3d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Brown 202 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Russell 167 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- State of Louisiana v. Joseph Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- State v. Thomas 909 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
- State of Louisiana v. Keithian Greenhouse La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- State v. Greenhouse 899 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Opinion text
593 So.2d 676 (1991) STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph DAIGLE. No. K91-1407. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. December 23, 1991. *677 Joseph Daigle, pro se. J. Nathan Stansbury, Dist. Atty., Lafayette, for the State. Before GUIDRY, DOUCET and YELVERTON, JJ. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 provides the jurisdictional time limits for filing an application for post-conviction relief. The trial court has no authority to extend those limits beyond the delays provided by the legislature. Therefore, the trial court was correct in denying relator's motion for extension of time and his application for post-conviction relief. Further, the trial court did not err in denying relator's request for transcripts as he has failed to show a particularized need. Relator's request for a stay of the proceedings is likewise denied.