Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Daughtery, 563 So. 2d 1171.
-
State v. Henry
147 So. 3d 1143
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
d by the police did not render the procedure used by police unconstitutionally suggestive or taint the eyewitness’ identification of the defendant prior to and during trial, especially where the jury was aware that the eyewitness had seen defendant’s photograph prior to identifying him in a lineup and the eyewitness identified only the defendant in the police lineup); (La.App.
- State v. Gay 136 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
-
State v. Castro
40 So. 3d 1036
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
385 , 166 L.Ed.2d 276 (2006) ( (La.App.
- State v. Jacobs 904 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
- State v. Smith 681 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- State v. Davis 666 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- State v. Caine 652 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- State v. McCutcheon 633 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- State v. Bennett 633 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Medine 623 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Crawford 619 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Fontenot 618 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. LeBlanc 618 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Riley 613 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- State v. Ross 604 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- State v. Crandell 604 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Battieste 597 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- State v. Barnes 592 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
- State v. Thomas 589 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Mosby 581 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Gordon 582 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991