Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Young, 569 So. 2d 570.

25 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Isaiah M. Childs La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
  • State v. Marrero 92 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Kennedy 823 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
    [23] See also Sanders, 93-0001 at p. 20, 648 So.2d at 1288 ("As to the five ultimately selected to sit on the petit jury, the individual questioning by the trial judge supports the conclusion that although the jurors had suffered exposure to the publicity, none were so impressed by it as to be incapable of rendering a fair and impartial verdict"); (La.App.
  • State v. Langley 813 So. 2d 356 La. 2002
  • State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
  • State v. Lucas 762 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State Ex Rel. Roper v. Cain 763 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Thibodeaux 728 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    At the conclusion of the hearing, (La.App.
  • State v. Guillory 715 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Turning to the merits of the Defendant's claim, (La.App.
  • State v. Francis 709 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Jackson 707 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    2d Cir.1993), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Banks 692 So. 2d 1051 La. 1997
    Russell, 416 So.2d at 1290 ; see also Sanders, 93-0001 at 20, 648 So.2d at 1288 ("As to the five ultimately selected to sit on the petit jury, the individual questioning by the trial judge supports the conclusion that although the jurors had suffered exposure to the publicity, none were so impressed by it as to be incapable of rendering a fair and impartial verdict."); (La.
  • State v. Campbell 651 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Arbuthnot 625 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Jones 623 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    art. 800 (as amended by Acts 1983, No. 181, § 1); (La.App.
  • State v. Tyler 619 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Acts, No. 181, § 1); , 584-85 n. 19 (La.App.
  • State v. Essex 618 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Thom 615 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    5 Cir. 1988); -577 (La.App.
  • State v. Thomas 609 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Ross 604 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Johnson 595 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Isgitt 590 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Bailey 585 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    309 , 74 L.Ed.2d 288 (1982); (La.
  • State v. Young 575 So. 2d 386 La. 1991
    Prior report: La.App., .