Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Martin, 582 So. 2d 306.

13 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Peter A. Barrosse La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
1990), the Second Circuit stated that “[d]ue diligence in discovering if a juror is a convicted felon 23-KA-393 7 requires that the defendant specifically ask questions relating to prior felony convictions and that the juror falsely deny their existence.” The First Circuit considered defendant’s (La.
State v. Nixon 250 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Martin , , 315-16 (La.
State v. Zeno 155 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Adams 119 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“When the evidence of a habit consists of ‘specific instances of conduct,’ the instances must be ‘sufficient in number to warrant a finding that the habit existed or that the practice was routine.’ ” (La.App.
Joseph v. Williams 105 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Anderson 784 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
art. 405A & , 314-15 n. 4 (La.App.
State v. McBride 773 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Corley 703 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Clark 670 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Galliano 639 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Folse 623 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Herrod, 412 So.2d at 566 ; (La.App.
State v. Hill 610 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Martin 588 So. 2d 113 La. 1991
Prior report: La.App., .