State of Louisiana v. Michael Alexander

STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

04-788

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

MICHAEL ALEXANDER

************

APPEAL FROM THE
THIRTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,
PARISH OF ALLEN, NO. 2001-5496,
HONORABLE JOHN P. NAVARRE, DISTRICT JUDGE

************

MICHAEL G. SULLIVAN
JUDGE

************

Court composed of Jimmie C. Peters, Michael G. Sullivan, and John B. Scofield,*
Judges.

REVERSED; ACQUITTAL ORDERED.

Douglas L. Hebert, Jr.
District Attorney
John Erwin Demoruelle
Assistant District Attorney
Post Office Drawer 839
Oberlin, Louisiana 70655
(337) 639-2641
Counsel for State of Louisiana

James Michael Small
Attorney at Law
Post Office Box 1470
Alexandria, Louisiana 71309
(318) 487-8963
Counsel for Defendant/Appellant:
Michael Alexander

*
John B. Scofield participated in this decision by appointment of the Louisiana Supreme
Court as Judge Pro Tempore.

SULLIVAN, Judge.

On April 18, 2001, at 6:30 a.m., Michael Alexander shot and killed Frederick

Victorian. He was charged with manslaughter in violation of La.R.S. 14:31(A)(1).

Following a bench trial, Mr. Alexander was convicted of negligent homicide, a

responsive verdict for manslaughter. La.R.S. 14:32. He was sentenced to five years

at hard labor, suspended, three years supervised probation, a fine of two thousand five

hundred dollars, and one thousand hours of community service.

For the following reasons, we reverse the conviction.

Discussion

Defendant admits shooting Mr. Victorian but asserts that he did so in self-

defense. He urges that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction.

Louisiana Revised Statute 14:20 provides that a homicide is justifiable:

(1) When committed in self-defense by one who reasonably
believes that he is in imminent danger of losing his life or receiving
great bodily harm and that the killing is necessary to save himself from
that danger.

When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, appellate courts are controlled

by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v.

Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), and must determine

“whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was

sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had

been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Captville, 448 So.2d 676, 678

(La.1984). When a defendant claims that he acted in self-defense, the State has the

burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that he did not act in self-defense.

State v. Brown, 414 So.2d 726 (La.1982). Defendant argues that the State failed to

carry its burden of proof on this issue. Therefore, we must determine whether,

viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier

of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that he did not act in

self-defense. State v. Matthews, 464 So.2d 298 (La.1985).

Sadly, the scenario surrounding Mr. Victorian’s death is not uncommon: a

jealous husband (Mr. Victorian) seeks out his wife (Donna Coleman) and the new

man in her life (Defendant), and tragedy results. Mr. Victorian and Donna Coleman

were married on May 17, 1996; they had two children. Ms. Coleman separated from

Mr. Victorian in September 2000; she filed for divorce on March 9, 2001. At

Defendant’s trial, Ms. Coleman described herself as a victim of domestic violence.

She testified that Mr. Victorian often accused her of having affairs with other men

and that he had physically and mentally abused her. She gave specific examples of

his abuse: putting guns to her head and knives to her throat; smashing her face into

a car window for talking to a pharmacist at a T-ball game; and beating her and

accusing her of having sex with a doctor after she received a free sample of medicine

for their son.

Ms. Coleman filed complaints against Mr. Victorian with the Oakdale Police

Department on October 25, 2000, and November 25, 2000. The October 25, 2000

complaint alleged that they had gotten into an argument because she went to a

banquet, and he accused her of sitting next to a white man. The complaint also stated

that he had hit her in the face and gone to her place of employment looking for her

administrator. The November 25, 2000 complaint was that Mr. Victorian was

following her and that she was scared of him. When she filed for divorce,

Ms. Coleman obtained a restraining order against him. Mr. Victorian filed a

complaint against Ms. Coleman on December 26, 2000, in which he alleged that she

had stolen his .380 caliber handgun.

2

Ms. Coleman is a licensed practical nurse and worked at Oakdale Community

Hospital when she separated from Mr. Victorian. She testified that she left her job

at the hospital in March 2001 and began working full time for Defendant because she

felt the hospital had become unsafe for her, explaining that Mr. Victorian had

threatened her at work. Defendant is a registered nurse anesthetist and owns Oakdale

Anesthesia, Inc. He knew Ms. Coleman from her employment at the hospital and

hired her to do billing for his business. Ms. Coleman testified that when she began

working for Defendant she worked the same hours Mr. Victorian worked, 10:00 p.m.

until 6:00 a.m., in an attempt to make herself “invisible” to him. She and Defendant

admitted that they had “sexual encounters” after she began working for him in

December 2000 but denied having an affair. Ms. Coleman testified that Mr. Victorian

had threatened her life on many occasions and had threatened to kill Defendant from

January 2001 until the day of the shooting.

Defendant testified that Ms. Coleman told him about Mr. Victorian’s threats

against him. He also testified that he knew Mr. Victorian had physically attacked

Ms. Coleman and that she had obtained a restraining order against him. He testified

that he was fearful of Mr. Victorian because of his threats. He admitted that he

purchased a .40 caliber handgun on October 27, 2000, but denied purchasing the gun

because of Mr. Victorian, explaining that he purchased the gun for personal

protection because he often carries a deposit bag to the bank for his business.

Ammunition for the .40 caliber gun and for a .452 magnum were found in

Defendant’s vehicle after the shooting. Defendant testified that he used the

ammunition for target practice. Defendant has another gun registered in his name, but

it was not in his vehicle during these events.

3

The night before the shooting, Ms. Coleman worked for Defendant. Defendant

testified that he also worked that night and left the hospital at 11:00 p.m. and went to

the “call room” for the hospital, which is in the same building as the office in which

Ms. Coleman did billing for his office. Defendant further related that, at

approximately 6:20 the next morning, he set out to drive Ms. Coleman to her home

and that he was then going to the hospital.

As they drove toward her home, Ms. Coleman noticed Mr. Victorian following

them and told Defendant. She testified that she was very terrified and believed that

Mr. Victorian would carry out his threats to kill her and Defendant and that she

relayed her fears to Defendant. She testified that Defendant turned into the hospital

parking lot to confirm that Mr. Victorian was following them. They both testified

that they hoped Mr. Victorian would drive on. Instead, he followed them into the

parking lot, got out of his car, and stood talking and gesturing toward them, but they

could not hear what he said.

Shirley Miles, an employee at the hospital, testified that when she arrived for

work that morning at about 6:30, she pulled into the front parking lot behind a

Suburban (Defendant’s vehicle); an old blue car (Mr. Victorian’s vehicle) pulled in

behind her. When she got out of her car, she noticed the driver of the blue car

standing outside his car. Ms. Miles testified that she heard the man say, “Don’t run

you MF,” then the Suburban drove off and the blue car followed it toward town.

Ms. Coleman testified that she told Defendant there was no reason

Mr. Victorian should be following them and that she had a restraining order against

him. She asked him to take her to the police station because she felt Mr. Victorian

needed to be disciplined for violating the restraining order. According to

4

Ms. Coleman, Defendant drove toward the police station as fast as he safely could.

On the way, they saw a police car coming toward them. Defendant blew his horn and

rolled down his window in an attempt to flag down the officer; however, the officer

did not stop. Ms. Coleman admitted that Defendant had a cell phone with him, but

they did not think to use it to call for help.

Ms. Coleman further testified that when they arrived at the police station, she

jumped out of the Suburban before it came to a stop and ran into the police station.

She testified that she looked back as she ran and saw Mr. Victorian’s car parked right

behind Defendant’s Suburban. She also testified that she saw Mr. Victorian holding

a long object that appeared to be the barrel of a shotgun and that she believed she

would be shot as she ran into the station. She yelled for help, as she entered the

police station, stating she had a restraining order against her husband and that he was

chasing them. She then heard gunshots outside. She estimated that it took her four

to five seconds to run inside before she heard the gunshots. Ms. Coleman testified

that she thought Defendant had been shot and killed, explaining that she knew her

husband owned a gun and believed that he had carried out his threats to kill

Defendant.

Defendant does not have a criminal record. He testified that he was terrified

because of Mr. Victorian’s threats against him and that he drove as quickly as he

could toward the police station. He admitted that he did not use his cell phone to call

for help, explaining that he was concerned with getting to the police station. On the

way to the station, Defendant saw a police officer driving toward him. He tried to

lower his electric window and flag the officer down and that he got his hand partially

through the opening in the window, but the officer waved and continued driving. He

5

testified that he hoped to have the officer prevent Mr. Victorian from getting out of

his car with a weapon and that, if he had planned to harm Mr. Victorian, he would not

have tried to flag down an officer.

Officer Virgil West testified that he was on patrol that morning when he saw

a gray Suburban at 6:30 on Seventh Street and a blue Oldsmobile Cutlass following

it. He testified that he did not notice anything out of the ordinary about the two

vehicles. He heard the Suburban’s horn blow and saw a hand wave. He waved back,

believing it was someone he knew who had a similar vehicle. He could not see inside

the vehicle, but remembered seeing a hand inside the window; he did not recall seeing

a hand outside the Suburban window.

Within a few seconds of passing Officer West, Defendant arrived at the police

station. He testified that Ms. Coleman jumped out of the Suburban, as he was

applying his brakes to park, and ran into the police station. He next testified that, as

he parked, he reached over and closed the passenger’s door, which had not closed

when Ms. Coleman exited. Defendant further testified that he saw Mr. Victorian’s

car behind him when he was about to get out of his Suburban. He then saw

Mr. Victorian coming at him with a weapon, which he thought was a shotgun. He

testified that he was very scared and nervous and got out of the Suburban with his .40

caliber gun in his hand, intending to run into the police station; however,

Mr. Victorian charged at him. He explained that he did not stay in his Suburban

because he felt he could be shot through the door. Once out of his Suburban,

Defendant testified that he was at the end of his door but unable to get around the

door because Mr. Victorian was “right up on” him. At that point, Mr. Victorian was

“face to face” with Defendant and made a swinging motion with the weapon in his

6

hand. Defendant explained that he backed into the doorway of the Suburban then

stopped, turned, and fired in a split second because Mr. Victorian continued toward

him. He did not know that Mr. Victorian had been hit because he continued

advancing toward him, and he shot two more times. Defendant knew then that

Mr. Victorian had been hit because he stopped and stood in front of him. He pushed

Mr. Victorian to the side and went around him to go into the police station. As he

walked to the police station door, Defendant saw Mr. Victorian fall to the ground and

the stick fall and roll away from him. Defendant testified that throughout these events

he was afraid for his life.

Oakdale Police Officer Laticia Alidia Reese testified that she was working at

the police station when the shooting occurred. She testified that around 6:30 a.m.

Ms. Coleman entered the front door of the police station, hurried through the waiting

room, and approached her at the dispatcher’s office. She described Ms. Coleman as

very excited, panicky, and hysterical. She testified that Ms. Coleman stated:

“There’s a man outside that we have a restraining order against.” Officer Reese

testified that two seconds later she heard three gunshots fired in rapid succession. In

her incident report prepared the day of the shooting, Officer Reese stated that she

heard gunshots immediately after Ms. Coleman stated there was a man outside.

Officer Reese testified that Defendant told them, “He was chasing me with a stick.

He was coming at me with a stick.”

Oakdale Police Officer Laura “Penny” Kirklin was also at the station the

morning of the shooting. She testified that she heard the gunshots from her office and

described the cadence of shots as “pow, pow, pow.” She left her office and went to

the lobby where she saw Defendant and Ms. Coleman. She described Ms. Coleman

7

as screaming, hollering, and crying. She testified that she believed Ms. Coleman was

really afraid. Officer Kirklin also spoke with Defendant and described him as

nervous or upset.

Oakdale Police dispatcher Charlene Vickers Hutchins testified that she heard

“what appeared to be tire squealing like someone slamming on the brakes” and loud

voices outside the station shortly before the shooting. Defendant testified that he

believed the sound described by Officer Hutchins was Mr. Victorian jamming his car

into “Park” as he pulled into the parking lot, which may explain Mr. Victorian’s

speed in exiting his vehicle and charging Defendant. Officer Hutchins further

testified that, after she heard the gunshots, she opened the door of the police station

and saw a black man within a foot or two of the door with a gun in his hand. He was

pointing the gun and looking toward the parking lot. She told him to give her the

gun; he said “he’s got a pipe” or “he was after me with a pipe.” She again told him

to give her the gun, and he did. Officer Hutchins described Defendant as nervous,

scared, and trying to get away from Mr. Victorian.

The evidence established that Mr. Victorian parked his car at an angle behind

Defendant’s Suburban such that it would have been impossible for Defendant to back

out of his parking space and that he was within two or three feet of Defendant when

he was shot. Officer Reese testified that the driver’s door of the Suburban was open

and that Mr. Victorian was lying on his stomach diagonally between the open door

and the interior of the Suburban, about one foot from the Suburban. She testified that

a long wooden stick with gray tape on it was on the ground about two feet from the

Suburban’s driver’s side rear tire. The stick was parallel to Mr. Victorian’s body,

about two to three feet from him. According to Officer Reese, Mr. Victorian was still

8

breathing when the ambulance arrived and took him to the hospital. Officer Kirklin

testified that Mr. Victorian was three to four feet from the driver’s side of the

Suburban and that the position of the stick was consistent with where she would

expect it to be if Mr. Victorian was holding it when he fell. Officer Hutchins testified

that she saw Mr. Victorian laying with his head under the open Suburban door. She

smelled a very strong odor of alcohol coming from him and from his car. She saw a

stick laying against the rear driver-side tire, partially underneath the Suburban, which

looked like it rolled there when Mr. Victorian dropped it and fell to the ground.

When Officer West arrived at the scene, he saw Mr. Victorian lying three or

four feet from the side of the Suburban. He saw the stick right in front of the rear tire

in a position that was consistent with it having fallen from Mr. Victorian’s hand when

he fell to the ground. He also testified that Mr. Victorian’s vehicle smelled like

alcohol and that there was a beer bottle in the front console. He placed Defendant

under arrest.

Lieutenant Charles Powers testified that he arrived after the shooting, and

Mr. Victorian had already been taken to the hospital. He collected the evidence at the

scene, which included Defendant’s .40 caliber handgun, three spent shell casings, and

Mr. Victorian’s wooden stick. He searched Defendant’s vehicle and found another

fully loaded ten-round clip of .40 caliber bullets, and boxes of .40 caliber and .357

Magnum bullets. He also recovered a cell phone from Defendant at the police station.

Lieutenant Powers also searched Mr. Victorian’s vehicle and found a 22-ounce beer

bottle, a prescription bottle of Prozac, and a box of .380 caliber bullets but no

weapon. Tests performed on a sample of Mr. Victorian’s blood showed that he had

a blood alcohol level of .26 milligrams.

9

A few weeks before the shooting, Carol Craig, another one of Defendant’s

employees, told him that Mr. Victorian had told her that he was out to get him.

Ms. Craig worked part time for Defendant and part time for Centennial Wireless. She

testified that Mr. Victorian visited her store to purchase service about two to three

weeks before the shooting. When Ms. Craig asked Mr. Victorian how his family was

doing, he told her his wife was sleeping with an old “MF” and named Defendant.

Mr. Victorian told her that he was going to cripple Defendant for the rest of his life,

explaining that he would use an axe handle that he kept in his car. Ms. Craig also

testified that Mr. Victorian told her that he had almost gotten Defendant one night

outside the hospital, but someone had walked up to Defendant, so he left him alone.

Ms. Craig believed Mr. Victorian was serious when he threatened Defendant. She

testified that she told Defendant about the threats approximately one week after

Mr. Victorian made them because she was scared to work at his office.

The night before the shooting, Mr. Victorian worked the night shift from

6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. at Pine Prairie Correctional Facility. His co-worker,

Christopher Scott Paul, testified that during that time Mr. Victorian told him he was

married, had a beautiful wife, two beautiful children, and a good marriage until his

wife started cheating on him and that Mr. Victorian named Defendant as the man

involved with his wife. Mr. Paul further testified that Mr. Victorian told him he

wanted to bust Defendant’s knee caps with an axe handle wrapped in duct tape to

make him suffer. Mr. Paul also testified that Mr. Victorian told him he was going to

do something to his wife as well. Mr. Paul testified that he and another co-worker,

Charlene Dupre, tried to talk Mr. Victorian out of his plans. According to Mr. Paul,

the stick in Mr. Victorian’s possession at the time of his death fit the description of

10

the stick he planned to use on Defendant. Ms. Dupre testified that around 2:00 or

3:00 that morning Mr. Victorian stated that, after he got off work, he was going to get

his revenge against Defendant. There is no evidence that Defendant had knowledge

of these threats before his encounter with Mr. Victorian.

Calcasieu Parish Coroner Terry Welke, an expert in forensic pathology,

testified that Mr. Victorian had three gunshot wounds, one to the left outer chest, one

to the right forearm, and one to the back left shoulder. The fatal bullet traveled from

Mr. Victorian’s left front chest to the right side of his back in a slightly upward

position. He testified that the wound on Mr. Victorian’s forearm could have been

sustained if Mr. Victorian was holding an object. However, he also testified that the

injury could have occurred if Mr. Victorian was standing with his arm down at his

side.

Mr. Welke could not determine the exact distance between Mr. Victorian and

the shooter on the chest or forearm wounds and estimated it to be at least two feet, but

he acknowledged that the distance could have been a little closer than two feet. With

regard to the wound on Mr. Victorian’s left back shoulder, Mr. Welke testified that

the barrel of the gun was in close proximity to the skin when that shot was fired

because the injury contained gun powder, soot, and there was a line caused by the

barrel of the gun. He also testified that Mr. Victorian’s back was toward the end of

the gun barrel and agreed that, hypothetically, the shoulder wound could have

occurred when Mr. Victorian turned to swing an object at the shooter. This testimony

was uncontradicted.

Bob Frye of the Southwest Louisiana Crime Lab testified as an expert in

firearm and tool marking. He stated that the three spent shell casings in evidence

11

were fired from Defendant’s .40 caliber weapon. He determined that the weapon was

approximately two feet from Mr. Victorian’s chest when it was fired because there

was gun powder on the T-shirt Mr. Victorian was wearing when he was shot.

The State had the burden of proving that Defendant did not shoot Mr. Victorian

in self-defense; therefore, we must determine whether he reasonably believed that he

was in imminent danger of losing his life or receiving great bodily harm and that

killing Mr. Victorian was necessary to save himself from that danger. La.R.S. 14:20;

State v. Brown, 93-1471 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/4/94), 640 So.2d 488. Because there were

no witnesses to the shooting other than Defendant, the State had to rely on

circumstantial evidence to disprove his self-defense claim. Where an essential

element of a crime is sought to be proven by circumstantial evidence, such evidence

must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. La.R.S. 15:438.

When all of the evidence presented by the State is examined in the light most

favorable to the prosecution, it is legally insufficient to meet the State’s heavy burden

of proof for the purpose of excluding every reasonable hypothesis that Defendant did

not shoot Mr. Victorian in self-defense.

The trial court determined that Defendant could have exited the passenger’s

door of the Suburban and escaped to safety in the police station. While the possibility

of escape is a factor to be considered when determining whether or not the defendant

reasonably believed deadly force was necessary to avoid danger, there is no

unqualified duty to retreat. State v. Carrier, 95-1003 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/6/96), 670

So.2d 794, writ denied, 96-881 (La. 9/20/96), 679 So.2d 431. Furthermore, it is not

the only factor to be considered: the excitement and confusion of the situation, the

possibilities of using force or violence short of killing, and the defendant’s

12

knowledge of the assailant’s bad character are other factors to be considered. State

v. Nelson, 34,077 (La.App. 2 Cir. 12/6/00), 775 So.2d 579; State v. Hudson, 33,357

(La.App. 2 Cir. 5/10/00), 760 So.2d 591.

The trial court’s suggestion that Defendant could have retreated does not take

into account Mr. Victorian’s speed in exiting from his car with his weapon and

charging Defendant. Defendant testified that Mr. Victorian was in front of his car

charging toward him when he first saw him in the parking lot. The trial court’s

conclusion also does not consider the time in which these events occurred.

Ms. Coleman testified that she heard shots within five seconds of having exited the

Suburban, and Officer Reese testified that she heard shots within two seconds of

Ms. Coleman entering the station. The trial court’s conclusion also does not consider

the difficulty Defendant would have had trying to maneuver over the console of the

Suburban under the circumstances: he knew Mr. Victorian had threatened his life and

Mr. Victorian was in close proximity to him with a weapon that Defendant believed

was a shotgun. Furthermore, Defendant’s door was closer to the police station than

the passenger’s door, and he would have had to cross Mr. Victorian’s path to get to

the police station, even if he exited the passenger’s door.

The physical evidence supports Defendant’s claim that he was in imminent

danger of death or severe bodily injury when he shot Mr. Victorian. Residue on the

back of Mr. Victorian’s left back shoulder indicates that Defendant’s gun was in close

proximity to the skin when the shot was made. This corroborates Defendant’s

testimony that he first shot Mr. Victorian as he charged him with his weapon raised

over his shoulder to strike him. Additionally, Defendant’s gun was within two feet

of Mr. Victorian when his chest wound and his forearm wound were inflicted and the

13

fatal bullet traveled in a slightly upward path. Furthermore, Mr. Victorian’s body was

positioned at or near the door of Defendant’s Suburban, and Mr. Victorian’s weapon

was near the back wheel of the Suburban in a position consistent with it having fallen

from his hands when he fell.

Mr. Victorian’s actions justify Defendant’s fear and actions. Defendant sought

refuge at the Oakdale Police Station, but Mr. Victorian was not deterred. He

continued his pursuit of Defendant in the parking lot, charging him with a weapon.

He was also not deterred by Defendant’s possession of a gun when he exited his

vehicle. Mr. Victorian’s blood alcohol content was .26, which probably contributed

to, and may have heightened, his irrational behavior.

Lastly, Defendant’s demeanor as he entered the police station also corroborates

his belief that he was in imminent danger from Mr. Victorian–he was described by

Officer Hutchins as nervous, scared, and trying to get away from Mr. Victorian.

The evidence leads to the conclusion that Defendant’s fear and belief that he

was in imminent danger of being killed or seriously injured by Mr. Victorian were

reasonable.

Disposition

Defendant’s conviction is reversed; his sentence is vacated and set aside, and

an acquittal is ordered entered of record.

REVERSED; ACQUITTAL ORDERED.

14