State of Louisiana v. Fay v. Perez, III
State of Louisiana v. Fay v. Perez, III, No. KA-0007-0238 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Oct. 3, 2007).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
07-238
consolidated with 07-229, 07-230, 07-231,
07-232, 07-233, 07-234, 07-235, 07-236, and 07-237
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VERSUS
FAY PEREZ, III
************
APPEAL FROM THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,
PARISH OF VERMILION, NO. 41553,
HONORABLE BYRON HEBERT, DISTRICT JUDGE
************
MICHAEL G. SULLIVAN
JUDGE
************
Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux, Chief Judge, Marc T. Amy, and
Michael G. Sullivan, Judges.
REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
Michael Harson
District Attorney
Ted L. Ayo
Assistant District Attorney
Post Office Box 175
Abbeville, Louisiana 70511-0175
(337) 898-4320
Counsel for:
State of Louisiana
Mark O. Foster
Louisiana Appellate Project
Post Office Box 2057
Natchitoches, Louisiana 71457-2057
(318) 572-5693
Counsel for Defendant/Appellant:
Fay V. Perez, III
SULLIVAN, Judge.
For the reasons assigned in State v. Perez, 07-229 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/__/07),
___ So.2d ___, this matter is remanded to the trial court for another evidentiary
hearing to determine whether the State’s agreement to Defendant’s plea was
invalidated by vacation of the restitution to victims whose cases were dismissed. If
the trial court imposes restitution as a condition of probation, it is instructed not to
order restitution to a victim’s insurer and to establish a determinate, specified
payment plan for all fees and restitution amounts.