State of Louisiana v. Robert Milton Robinson
State of Louisiana v. Robert Milton Robinson, No. KA-0009-0735 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Dec. 9, 2009).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Bamburg 772 So. 2d 356
- State v. Williams 815 So. 2d 908
- State v. Williams 836 So. 2d 59
Opinion text
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
09-0735
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VERSUS
ROBERT MILTON ROBINSON
************
APPEAL FROM THE
TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF NATCHITOCHES, NO. C14227
HONORABLE ERIC R. HARRINGTON, DISTRICT JUDGE
************
JIMMIE C. PETERS
JUDGE
************
Court composed of Jimmie C. Peters, Marc T. Amy, and Michael G. Sullivan,
Judges.
AFFIRMED.
R. Stuart Wright
Assistant District Attorney
10th Judicial District
P. O. Box 838
Natchitoches, LA 71458-0838
(318) 357-2214
COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE:
State of Louisiana
Edward K. Bauman
Louisiana Appellate Project
P. O. Box 1641
Lake Charles, LA 70602
(318) 491-0570
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT:
Robert Milton Robinson
PETERS, J.
The State of Louisiana (state) charged the defendant, Robert Milton Robinson,
by bill of information with possession of cocaine, in violation of La.R.S. 40:967. The
defendant initially pled not guilty to the offense, but subsequently withdrew his
former plea and entered a plea of guilty to the charge. Thereafter, the trial court
sentenced him to serve four years at hard labor. The defendant then perfected this
appeal, asserting in his one assignment of error that the sentence imposed was
excessive.
The defendant did not object at sentencing and did not file a motion to
reconsider the sentence imposed. Failure to object and failure to timely file a motion
to reconsider the sentence imposed precludes review of the sentence on appeal. State
v. Bamburg, 00-675 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/2/00), 772 So.2d 356. See also State v.
Williams, 01-998 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/6/02), 815 So.2d 908, writ denied, 02-578 (La.
1/31/03), 836 So.2d 59. Thus, we find that the defendant has waived his right to seek
review of his sentence.
DISPOSITION
We affirm the defendant’s sentence in all respects.
AFFIRMED.
This opinion is NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Rule 2-
16.3, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal.