State of Louisiana v. Debbie W. Draper
State of Louisiana v. Debbie W. Draper, No. KA-0010-0672 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Aug. 4, 2010).
Opinion text
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
10-672
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VERSUS
DEBBIE W. DRAPER
**********
APPEAL FROM THE
THIRTY-SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF BEAUREGARD, NO. CR-1157-05
HONORABLE MARTHA ANN O’NEAL
**********
ELIZABETH A. PICKETT
JUDGE
**********
Court composed of Sylvia R. Cooks, Elizabeth A. Pickett, and James T. Genovese,
Judges.
APPEAL DISMISSED. DEFENDANT IS PERMITTED TO
FILE AN APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY WRITS
WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS
DECISION.
Hon. David W. Burton
District Attorney - 36th JDC
P.O. Box 99
DeRidder, LA 70634
COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE:
State of Louisiana
Debbie W. Draper, Pro Se
Avoyelles Simmsport Corr. Ctr.
P.O. Box 819
Simmsport, LA 71369
Pickett, Judge.
The Defendant’s probation was revoked on March 25, 2010, and she was
ordered to serve the original sentence of three years at hard labor. On April 12, 2010,
the Defendant filed a Motion and Order for Appeal seeking review of her probation
revocation. The motion was granted on April 28, 2010.
An appeal was lodged with this court on June 4, 2010. On June 14, 2010, this
court issued a rule to show cause why the appeal in this case should not be dismissed,
as the judgment at issue is not appealable. The Defendant responded to the rule to
show cause, but failed to state why her appeal should not be dismissed.
We find that the judgment at issue herein is not appealable pursuant to La.Code
Crim.P. arts. 912 and 912.1. Therefore, the appeal in the above-captioned case is
hereby dismissed. The Defendant is hereby permitted to file a proper application for
supervisory writs, in compliance with Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-3,
within thirty days from the date of this decision. The Defendant is not required to file
a notice of intent to seek writs or obtain an order setting a return date pursuant to
Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-3, as we hereby construe the motion for
appeal as a notice of intent to seek a supervisory writ.
APPEAL DISMISSED. DEFENDANT IS PERMITTED TO FILE AN
APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY WRITS WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
FROM THE DATE OF THIS DECISION.